Using partial correlation to enhance structural equation modeling of functional MRI data.

In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data analysis, effective connectivity investigates the influence that brain regions exert on one another. Structural equation modeling (SEM) has been the main approach to examine effective connectivity. In this paper, we propose a method that, given a set of regions, performs partial correlation analysis. This method provides an approach to effective connectivity that is data driven, in the sense that it does not require any prior information regarding the anatomical or functional connections. To demonstrate the practical relevance of partial correlation analysis for effective connectivity investigation, we reanalyzed data previously published [Bullmore, Horwitz, Honey, Brammer, Williams, Sharma, 2000. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? NeuroImage 11, 289-301]. Specifically, we show that partial correlation analysis can serve several purposes. In a pre-processing step, it can hint at which effective connections are structuring the interactions and which have little influence on the pattern of connectivity. As a post-processing step, it can be used both as a simple and visual way to check the validity of SEM optimization algorithms and to show which assumptions made by the model are valid, and which ones should be further modified to better fit the data.

[1]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[2]  Habib Benali,et al.  Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[4]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[9]  Michael I. Jordan Graphical Models , 1998 .

[10]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Neural modeling, functional brain imaging, and cognition , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Silke Dodel,et al.  Condition-dependent functional connectivity: syntax networks in bilinguals , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[14]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[15]  J. Schmee An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1986 .

[16]  Habib Benali,et al.  Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[18]  J. Daunizeau,et al.  Conditional correlation as a measure of mediated interactivity in fMRI and MEG/EEG , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  B. Biswal,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting‐state functional connectivity maps , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[20]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[22]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  Data analysis paradigms for metabolic‐flow data: Combining neural modeling and functional neuroimaging , 1994 .

[24]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[26]  G. Marrelec,et al.  Heading for data-driven measures of effective connectivity in functional MRI , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[27]  J. N. R. Jeffers,et al.  Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. , 1990 .

[28]  Tao Xiong,et al.  A combined SVM and LDA approach for classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[29]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .