An assessment of uncertainty on a loft L2-5 lbloca pct based on the ACE-RSM APPROACH: Complementary work for the oecd bemuse phase-III program

As pointed out in the OECD BEMUSE Program, when a high computation time is taken to obtain the relevant output values of a complex physical model (or code), the number of statistical samples that must be evaluated through it is a critical factor for the sampling-based uncertainty analysis. Two alternative methods have been utilized to avoid the problem associated with the size of these statistical samples: one is based on Wilks’ formula, which is based on simple random sampling, and the other is based on the conventional nonlinear regression approach. While both approaches provide a useful means for drawing conclusions on the resultant uncertainty with a limited number of code runs, there are also some unique corresponding limitations. For example, a conclusion based on the Wilks’ formula can be highly affected by the sampled values themselves, while the conventional regression approach requires an a priori estimate on the functional forms of a regression model. The main objective of this paper is to assess the feasibility of the ACE-RSM approach as a complementary method to the Wilks’ formula and the conventional regression-based uncertainty analysis. This feasibility was assessed through a practical application of the ACE-RSM approach to the LOFT L2-5 LBLOCA PCT uncertainty analysis, which was implemented as a part of the OECD BEMUSE Phase III program.

[1]  F. J. Davis,et al.  Illustration of Sampling‐Based Methods for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part II - Ranking of Input Variables, Response Surface Validation, Distribution Effect and Technique Synopsis , 1981 .

[3]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[4]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[6]  A. de Crécy,et al.  The BEMUSE Programme: Best-Estimate Methods Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation - Phase 2 , 2004 .

[7]  Michael Murphy,et al.  Identifying Nonlinear Relationships in Regression using the ACE Algorithm , 2005 .

[8]  Young Seok Bang,et al.  A PARTICLE TRACKING MODEL TO PREDICT THE DEBRIS TRANSPORT ON THE CONTAINMENT FLOOR , 2010 .

[9]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  A FORTRAN-77 PROGRAM AND USER'S GUIDE FOR THE GENERATION OF LATIN HYPERCUBE AND RANDOM SAMPLES FOR USE WITH COMPUTER MODELS , 1984 .

[10]  J. Friedman,et al.  Estimating Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression and Correlation. , 1985 .

[11]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[12]  S. S. Wilks Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits , 1941 .

[13]  H. Glaeser,et al.  Best Estimate Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants: Uncertainty Evaluation. IAEA Safety Report Series , 2008 .

[14]  Graham B. Wallis,et al.  Evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[16]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[17]  John C. Lee,et al.  Critical heat flux correlation through the alternating conditional expectation algorithm , 1996 .