Minimizing Maximum (Weighted) Flow-Time on Related and Unrelated Machines

In this paper we initiate the study of job scheduling on related and unrelated machines so as to minimize the maximum flow time or the maximum weighted flow time (when each job has an associated weight). Previous work for these metrics considered only the setting of parallel machines, while previous work for scheduling on unrelated machines only considered $$L_p, p<\infty $$Lp,p<∞ norms. Our main results are: (1) we give an $$\mathcal {O}({\varepsilon }^{-3})$$O(ε-3)-competitive algorithm to minimize maximum weighted flow time on related machines where we assume that the machines of the online algorithm can process $$1+{\varepsilon }$$1+ε units of a job in 1 time-unit ($${\varepsilon }$$ε speed augmentation). (2) For the objective of minimizing maximum flow time on unrelated machines we give a simple $$2/{\varepsilon }$$2/ε-competitive algorithm when we augment the speed by $${\varepsilon }$$ε. For m machines we show a lower bound of $${\varOmega }(m)$$Ω(m) on the competitive ratio if speed augmentation is not permitted. Our algorithm does not assign jobs to machines as soon as they arrive. To justify this “drawback” we show a lower bound of $${\varOmega }(\log m)$$Ω(logm) on the competitive ratio of immediate dispatch algorithms. In both these lower bound constructions we use jobs whose processing times are in $$\left\{ 1,\infty \right\} $$1,∞, and hence they apply to the more restrictive subset parallel setting. (3) For the objective of minimizing maximum weighted flow time on unrelated machines we establish a lower bound of $${\varOmega }(\log m)$$Ω(logm)-on the competitive ratio of any online algorithm which is permitted to use $$s=\mathcal {O}(1)$$s=O(1) speed machines. In our lower bound construction, job j has a processing time of $$p_j$$pj on a subset of machines and infinity on others and has a weight $$1/p_j$$1/pj. Hence this lower bound applies to the subset parallel setting for the special case of minimizing maximum stretch.

[1]  Amit Kumar,et al.  All-Norms and All-L_p-Norms Approximation Algorithms , 2008, FSTTCS.

[2]  Tak Wah Lam,et al.  Trade-offs between speed and processor in hard-deadline scheduling , 1999, SODA '99.

[3]  Kirk Pruhs,et al.  Server Scheduling in the Weighted lp Norm , 2004, LATIN.

[4]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Resource augmentation for weighted flow-time explained by dual fitting , 2012, SODA.

[5]  Bala Kalyanasundaram,et al.  On-Line Load Balancing of Temporary Tasks , 1997, J. Algorithms.

[6]  Benjamin Moseley,et al.  Online scheduling to minimize the maximum delay factor , 2008, SODA.

[7]  Rajmohan Rajaraman,et al.  Improved algorithms for stretch scheduling , 2002, SODA '02.

[8]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Minimizing Maximum (Weighted) Flow-Time on Related and Unrelated Machines , 2013, ICALP.

[9]  Kirk Pruhs,et al.  Server scheduling in the Lp norm: a rising tide lifts all boat , 2003, STOC '03.

[10]  Monaldo Mastrolilli,et al.  On-line scheduling to minimize max flow time: an optimal preemptive algorithm , 2005, Oper. Res. Lett..

[11]  Michael A. Bender,et al.  Flow and stretch metrics for scheduling continuous job streams , 1998, SODA '98.

[12]  Yossi Azar,et al.  The competitiveness of on-line assignments , 1992, SODA '92.

[13]  Benjamin Moseley,et al.  An online scalable algorithm for minimizing lk-norms of weighted flow time on unrelated machines , 2011, SODA '11.

[14]  L Stephen Cox,et al.  A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats , 2014 .

[15]  Nicole Megow,et al.  Meeting Deadlines: How Much Speed Suffices? , 2011, ICALP.

[16]  Cynthia A. Phillips,et al.  Optimal Time-Critical Scheduling via Resource Augmentation , 1997, STOC '97.