Joint Temporal Point Pattern Models for Proximate Species Occurrence in a Fixed Area Using Camera Trap Data

The distinction between an overlap in species daily activity patterns and proximate co-occurrence of species for a location and time due to behavioral attraction or avoidance is critical when addressing the question of species co-occurrence. We use data from a dense grid of camera traps in a forest in central North Carolina to inform about proximate co-occurrence. Camera trigger times are recorded when animals pass in front of the camera’s field of vision. We view the data as a point pattern over time for each species and model the intensities driving these patterns. These species-specific intensities are modeled jointly in linear time to preserve the notion of co-occurrence. We show that a multivariate log-Gaussian Cox process incorporating both circular and linear time provides a preferred choice for modeling occurrence of forest mammals based on daily activity rhythms. Model inference is obtained under a hierarchical Bayesian framework with an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithm. After model fitting, we account for imperfect detection of individuals by the camera traps by incorporating species-specific detection probabilities that adjust estimates of occurrence and co-occurrence. We obtain rich inference including assessment of the probability of presence of one species in a particular time interval given presence of another species in the same or adjacent interval, enabling probabilities of proximate co-occurrence. Our results describe the ecology and interactions of four common mammals within this suburban forest including their daily rhythms, responses to temperature and rainfall, and effects of the presence of predator species. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

[1]  Andrew L. Rukhin,et al.  Tools for statistical inference , 1991 .

[2]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[3]  M. Stokes,et al.  Influences of weather and moonlight on activity patterns of small mammals: a biogeographical perspective , 2001 .

[4]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[5]  J. Nichols,et al.  Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly , 2004 .

[6]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  Nonstationary multivariate process modeling through spatially varying coregionalization , 2004 .

[7]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[8]  S. Gehrt,et al.  Interference competition between coyotes and raccoons: a test of the mesopredator release hypothesis , 2007 .

[9]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns , 2008 .

[10]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis , 2008 .

[11]  M. Linkie,et al.  Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data , 2009 .

[12]  Ryan P. Adams,et al.  Elliptical slice sampling , 2009, AISTATS.

[13]  J. Hodges,et al.  Adding Spatially-Correlated Errors Can Mess Up the Fixed Effect You Love , 2010 .

[14]  Murali Haran,et al.  Dimension reduction and alleviation of confounding for spatial generalized linear mixed models , 2010, 1011.6649.

[15]  E. M. Vieira,et al.  Seasonal patterns and influence of temperature on the daily activity of the diurnal neotropical rodent Necromys lasiurus , 2010 .

[16]  J. Hines,et al.  Two-species occupancy models: a new parameterization applied to co-occurrence of secretive rails. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  J. Ahumada,et al.  Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  C. Agostinelli,et al.  Using conditional circular kernel density functions to test hypotheses on animal circadian activity , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Bolin Ding,et al.  Attraction and Avoidance Detection from Movements , 2013, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[20]  R. Kays,et al.  Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data , 2014 .

[21]  Laura J. Pollock,et al.  Understanding co‐occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) , 2014 .

[22]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Restricted spatial regression in practice: geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification , 2015 .

[23]  Zhihai He,et al.  Volunteer-run cameras as distributed sensors for macrosystem mammal research , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  Tavis D. Forrester,et al.  A two-species occupancy model accommodating simultaneous spatial and interspecific dependence. , 2016, Ecology.

[25]  R. Kays Candid Creatures: How Camera Traps Reveal the Mysteries of Nature , 2016 .

[26]  Damon B. Lesmeister,et al.  Differential Habitat Use or Intraguild Interactions: What Structures a Carnivore Community? , 2016, PloS one.

[27]  Tavis D. Forrester,et al.  The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected areas in eastern North America , 2016 .

[28]  Mário Ferreira,et al.  Modeling stream fish distributions using interval‐censored detection times , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  Thomas J. Leininger,et al.  Bayesian Inference and Model Assessment for Spatial Point Patterns Using Posterior Predictive Samples , 2017 .

[30]  C. Carbone,et al.  Revealing kleptoparasitic and predatory tendencies in an African mammal community using camera traps: a comparison of spatiotemporal approaches , 2017 .

[31]  Tavis D. Forrester,et al.  Deer on the lookout: how hunting, hiking and coyotes affect white‐tailed deer vigilance , 2017 .

[32]  P. Meek,et al.  Diel activity patterns of northern Australian small mammals: variation, fixity, and plasticity , 2017, Journal of Mammalogy.

[33]  Brian M. Brost,et al.  Potential for spatial displacement of Cook Inlet beluga whales by anthropogenic noise in critical habitat , 2017 .