The Psychometrics of Mental Workload

Objective: A study was run to test the sensitivity of multiple workload indices to the differing cognitive demands of four military monitoring task scenarios and to investigate relationships between indices. Background: Various psychophysiological indices of mental workload exhibit sensitivity to task factors. However, the psychometric properties of multiple indices, including the extent to which they intercorrelate, have not been adequately investigated. Method: One hundred fifty participants performed in four task scenarios based on a simulation of unmanned ground vehicle operation. Scenarios required threat detection and/or change detection. Both single- and dual-task scenarios were used. Workload metrics for each scenario were derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram, transcranial Doppler sonography, functional near infrared, and eye tracking. Subjective workload was also assessed. Results: Several metrics showed sensitivity to the differing demands of the four scenarios. Eye fixation duration and the Task Load Index metric derived from EEG were diagnostic of single-versus dual-task performance. Several other metrics differentiated the two single tasks but were less effective in differentiating single- from dual-task performance. Psychometric analyses confirmed the reliability of individual metrics but failed to identify any general workload factor. An analysis of difference scores between low- and high-workload conditions suggested an effort factor defined by heart rate variability and frontal cortex oxygenation. Conclusions: General workload is not well defined psychometrically, although various individual metrics may satisfy conventional criteria for workload assessment. Application: Practitioners should exercise caution in using multiple metrics that may not correspond well, especially at the level of the individual operator.

[1]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Psychophysiological processes of mental effort investment , 2011 .

[2]  B. Cain A Review of the Mental Workload Literature , 2007 .

[3]  Pamela S. Tsang,et al.  Mental Workload and Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[4]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Psychophysiological responses to changes in workload during simulated air traffic control , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[6]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  A Comparison of Cerebral Hemovelocity and Blood Oxygen Saturation Levels during Vigilance Performance , 2010 .

[7]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Bob Hockey Challenges in Fatigue and Performance Research , 2017 .

[9]  S.M. Blanchard,et al.  The effect of light and dark periods on heart rate and heart rate variability in male broilers , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[10]  Shameem Nyla NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION , 2004 .

[11]  Rebecca Brown,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective and EEG-Based Measures of Mental Workload , 2013, HCI.

[12]  F. Thomas Eggemeier,et al.  Workload assessment methodology. , 1986 .

[13]  Bo Sun,et al.  The mixed-initiative experimental testbed for collaborative human robot interactions , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[14]  Tommy Strandvall,et al.  Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research , 2009, INTERACT.

[15]  D. Potter,et al.  Does preoccupation impair hazard perception? A simultaneous EEG and Eye Tracking study , 2013 .

[16]  Roland R. Griffiths,et al.  A critical review of caffeine withdrawal: empirical validation of symptoms and signs, incidence, severity, and associated features , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[17]  Guy Vingerhoets,et al.  Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography Monitoring of Cerebral Hemodynamics During Performance of Cognitive Tasks: A Review , 2000, Neuropsychology Review.

[18]  Melinda S. Jensen,et al.  Change blindness and inattentional blindness. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[19]  Thomas E. Nygren,et al.  Psychometric Properties of Subjective Workload Measurement Techniques: Implications for Their Use in the Assessment of Perceived Mental Workload , 1991 .

[20]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Adaptive training using an artificial neural network and EEG metrics for within- and cross-task workload classification , 2012, NeuroImage.

[21]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Real-Time Assessment of Mental Workload Using Psychophysiological Measures and Artificial Neural Networks , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Assessment of mental fatigue during car driving by using high resolution EEG activity and neurophysiologic indices , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Individual and team susceptibility to change blindness. , 2010, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[24]  S. P. Marshall,et al.  The Index of Cognitive Activity: measuring cognitive workload , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants.

[25]  D. Washburn,et al.  Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[26]  Andreas Henelius,et al.  Mental workload classification using heart rate metrics , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Grant Taylor,et al.  Establishing Workload Manipulations Utilizing a Simulated Environment , 2013, HCI.

[28]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Monitoring drivers' mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Louise Venables,et al.  The influence of task demand and learning on the psychophysiological response. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Individual differences in human–technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research and design , 2009 .

[31]  George Mason Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation:Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs , 2011 .

[32]  Graham Wilson,et al.  Psychophysiological assessment of workload in multi-task environments , 2020 .

[33]  Hankins Tc,et al.  A comparison of heart rate, eye activity, EEG and subjective measures of pilot mental workload during flight. , 1998, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[34]  Edward M. Hitchcock,et al.  Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[35]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[36]  David B. Boles,et al.  Predicting Dual-Task Performance With the Multiple Resources Questionnaire (MRQ) , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Gerald Matthews Personality and individual differences in cognitive fatigue. , 2011 .

[38]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[39]  Alison M Tollner Individual and team susceptibility to change blindness. , 2006 .

[40]  J. Horn A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[41]  James C. Christensen,et al.  Coadaptive Aiding and Automation Enhance Operator Performance , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[42]  Hasan Ayaz,et al.  Cognitive Workload Assessment of Air Traffic Controllers Using Optical Brain Imaging Sensors , 2010 .

[43]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Sensitivity of candidate markers of psychophysiological strain to cyclical changes in manual control load during simulated process control. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[44]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Fundamental examination of mental workload in the rail industry , 2005 .

[45]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Field validity of heart rate variability metrics produced by QRSTool and CMetX. , 2012, Psychological assessment.

[46]  William S. Helton,et al.  A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of sustained attention to local and global target features , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[48]  C. Wickens,et al.  Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload , 1988 .

[49]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[50]  Chad L. Stephens,et al.  Autonomic specificity of basic emotions: Evidence from pattern classification and cluster analysis , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[51]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[52]  R. Cattell Personality and mood by questionnaire. , 1973 .

[53]  Michael E. Smith,et al.  Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction , 2003 .

[54]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Naive Realism: Misplaced Faith in Realistic Displays , 2005 .

[55]  C. Guézennec,et al.  EEG and ECG changes during simulator operation reflect mental workload and vigilance. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[56]  R. Saxe Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Fundamentals of physiological computing , 2009, Interact. Comput..

[58]  James C. Christensen,et al.  The effects of day-to-day variability of physiological data on operator functional state classification , 2012, NeuroImage.

[59]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[60]  W J Horrey,et al.  Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[61]  J. Lacey Somatic response patterning and stress : some revisions of activation theory , 1967 .

[62]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[63]  N. Stroobant,et al.  Test-retest reliability of functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[64]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[65]  C Sato,et al.  [Optical imaging of brain function]. , 2001, No to shinkei = Brain and nerve.

[66]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Effects of Anxiety on Performance and Workload in an Air Defense Task , 2011 .

[67]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[68]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Estimating mental effort using heart rate and heart rate variability. , 2004 .

[69]  J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[71]  H. H. So,et al.  Development of QRS detection method for real-time ambulatory cardiac monitor , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[72]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Use of EEG Workload Indices for Diagnostic Monitoring of Vigilance Decrement , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[73]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Cerebral Hemodynamic Indices of Operator Fatigue in Vigilance , 2017 .

[74]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .