Three-dimensional geological modelling of AEM resistivity data — A comparison of three methods

Abstract Spatially dense Airborne Electromagnetic Method (AEM) surveys are increasingly acquired to provide a background for creating 3D geological models. These datasets provide a high degree of detail that is very time-consuming and challenging to incorporate in manually-produced geological models. Automated modelling methods are therefore needed to make the modelling process more time-efficient. In this study we evaluate the results of two automated modelling methods against the results of a manually constructed geological model. The study area is characterized by a sequence of Quaternary glacial till deposits on top of Pre-Quaternary sand and clay deposits. The tested automatic methods are 1) an approach for clay fraction modelling, where borehole and AEM resistivity models are integrated through inversion, and 2) a stochastic approach based on transition probability indicator statistics. The most significant difference between the model results is the ability of the manually constructed geological model to contain stratigraphic information, contrary to the sand–clay models generated by the automated approaches. When all the model results are translated to binary models, they are generally in good agreement. The models have different strengths and limitations and the later application of the model should therefore be taken into consideration when choosing the modelling approach.

[1]  J. L. Gunnink,et al.  Applying airborne electromagnetics in 3D stochastic geohydrological modelling for determining groundwater protection , 2015 .

[2]  Esben Auken,et al.  SkyTEM–a New High-resolution Helicopter Transient Electromagnetic System , 2004 .

[3]  Anne-Sophie Høyer,et al.  Analyzing the effects of geological and parameter uncertainty on prediction of groundwater head and travel time , 2013 .

[4]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Groundwater Flow and Sand Body Interconnectedness in a Thick, Multiple-Aquifer System , 1986 .

[5]  H. Kessler,et al.  Synopsis of current three-dimensional geological mapping and modeling in Geological Survey organizations , 2011 .

[6]  Anders Vest Christiansen,et al.  A method for cognitive 3D geological voxel modelling of AEM data , 2013, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[7]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Iterative modelling of AEM data based on a priori information from seismic and borehole data , 2014 .

[8]  E. Auken,et al.  A new processing system for very early time SkyTEM101 data , 2012 .

[9]  Anne-Sophie Høyer,et al.  Challenges in geophysical mapping of glaciotectonic structures , 2013 .

[10]  L. Feyen,et al.  Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multi-modal heterogeneous formations , 2006 .

[11]  O. Nielsen,et al.  Lithostratigraphy and depositional environments in the Upper Paleocene and Eocene of Denmark , 1985, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark.

[12]  M. Houmark‐Nielsen.  Pleistocene Glaciations in Denmark: A Closer Look at Chronology, Ice Dynamics and Landforms , 2011 .

[13]  Esben Auken,et al.  A concept for calculating accumulated clay thickness from borehole lithological logs and resistivity models for nitrate vulnerability assessment , 2014 .

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[15]  A. Keith Turner,et al.  Challenges and trends for geological modelling and visualisation , 2006 .

[16]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Challenges in conditioning a stochastic geological model of a heterogeneous glacial aquifer to a comprehensive soft data set , 2013 .

[17]  E. Auken,et al.  Imaging buried Quaternary valleys using the transient electromagnetic method , 2003 .

[18]  Holger Kessler,et al.  The capture and dissemination of integrated 3D geospatial knowledge at the British Geological Survey using GSI3D software and methodology , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[19]  E. Auken,et al.  Assessment of near-surface mapping capabilities by airborne transient electromagnetic data — An extensive comparison to conventional borehole data , 2014 .

[20]  A. Christiansen,et al.  An integrated processing scheme for high-resolution airborne electromagnetic surveys, the SkyTEM system , 2009 .

[21]  T. Sonnenborg,et al.  Transition probability‐based stochastic geological modeling using airborne geophysical data and borehole data , 2014 .

[22]  Stephen E. Silliman,et al.  Stochastic analysis of paths of high hydraulic conductivity in porous media , 1988 .

[23]  Xin He,et al.  The effect of training image and secondary data integration with multiple-point geostatistics in groundwater modelling , 2013 .

[24]  W. Gossel,et al.  High-resolution 3D spatial modelling of complex geological structures for an environmental risk assessment of abundant mining and industrial megasites , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  J. Griffioen,et al.  3D geology in a 2D country: perspectives for geological surveying in the Netherlands , 2013, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[26]  J. Gunnink,et al.  3D modelling of the shallow subsurface of Zeeland, the Netherlands , 2011, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[27]  G. Fogg,et al.  Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics , 1996 .

[28]  J. P. Delhomme,et al.  Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: A geostatistical approach , 1979 .

[29]  Peter Bauer-Gottwein,et al.  Large-scale 3-D modeling by integration of resistivity models and borehole data through inversion , 2014 .

[30]  A. Christiansen,et al.  A review of helicopter‐borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration , 2009 .

[31]  Stefan Piasecki,et al.  Lithostratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene - Miocene succession of Denmark , 2010 .

[32]  G. Weissmann,et al.  An integrated approach to shallow aquifer characterization: combining geophysics and geostatistics , 2010 .

[33]  F. Modugno,et al.  Integrating geophysical and geostatistical techniques to map the spatial variation of clay , 2012 .

[34]  R. M. Srivastava,et al.  Geostatistical characterization of groundwater flow parameters in a simulated aquifer , 1991 .

[35]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics , 2002 .

[36]  P. Gibbard,et al.  Quaternary Glaciations - Extent and Chronology: A closer look , 2011 .

[37]  E. Auken,et al.  Combining ground-based and airborne EM through Artificial Neural Networks for modelling glacial till under saline groundwater conditions , 2012 .

[38]  Flemming Jørgensen,et al.  Buried and open tunnel valleys in Denmark—erosion beneath multiple ice sheets , 2006 .

[39]  Andrea Viezzoli,et al.  Nitrate reduction in geologically heterogeneous catchments--a framework for assessing the scale of predictive capability of hydrological models. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  Esben Auken,et al.  Integrated management and utilization of hydrogeophysical data on a national scale , 2009 .

[41]  Steven F. Carle,et al.  Geologic heterogeneity and a comparison of two geostatistical models: Sequential Gaussian and transition probability-based geostatistical simulation , 2007 .

[42]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Quasi-3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion , 2008 .

[43]  Katherine R. Royse,et al.  Combining numerical and cognitive 3D modelling approaches in order to determine the structure of the Chalk in the London Basin , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[44]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling , 2012 .