Systematic development and feasibility testing of a multibehavioural digital prehabilitation intervention for patients approaching major surgery (iPREPWELL): A study protocol

Improving outcomes for people undergoing major surgery, specifically reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality remains a global health challenge. Prehabilitation involves the active preparation of patients prior to surgery, including support to tackle risk behaviours that mediate and undermine physical and mental health and wellbeing. The majority of prehabilitation interventions are delivered in person, however many patients express a preference for remotely-delivered interventions that provide them with tailored support and the flexibility. Digital prehabilitation interventions offer scalability and have the potential to benefit perioperative healthcare systems, however there is a lack of robustly developed and evaluated digital programmes for use in routine clinical care. We aim to systematically develop and test the feasibility of an evidence and theory-informed multibehavioural digital prehabilitation intervention ‘iPREPWELL’ designed to prepare patients for major surgery. The intervention will be developed with reference to the Behaviour Change Wheel, COM-B model, and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Codesign methodology will be used to develop a patient intervention and accompanying training intervention for healthcare professionals. Training will be designed to enable healthcare professionals to promote, support and facilitate delivery of the intervention as part of routine clinical care. Patients preparing for major surgery and healthcare professionals involved with their clinical care from two UK National Health Service centres will be recruited to stage 1 (systematic development) and stage 2 (feasibility testing of the intervention). Participants recruited at stage 1 will be asked to complete a COM-B questionnaire and to take part in a qualitative interview study and co-design workshops. Participants recruited at stage 2 (up to twenty healthcare professionals and forty participants) will be asked to take part in a single group intervention study where the primary outcomes will include feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of intervention delivery, receipt, and enactment. Healthcare professionals will be trained to promote and support use of the intervention by patients, and the training intervention will be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. The multifaceted and systematically developed intervention will be the first of its kind and will provide a foundation for further refinement prior to formal efficacy testing.

[1]  C. Greaves,et al.  Delivery fidelity of the REACT (REtirement in ACTion) physical activity and behaviour maintenance intervention for community dwelling older people with mobility limitations , 2022, BMC Public Health.

[2]  B. Hutton,et al.  Prehabilitation in adult patients undergoing surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. , 2021, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  J. Durrand,et al.  Prehabilitation and preparation for surgery: has the digital revolution arrived? , 2021, Anaesthesia.

[4]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols , 2021, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[5]  C. Short,et al.  The Role of Behavioral Science in Personalized Multimodal Prehabilitation in Cancer , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[6]  F. Marvel,et al.  Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  G. Tew,et al.  Community-based prehabilitation before elective major surgery: the PREP-WELL quality improvement project , 2020, BMJ open quality.

[8]  R. Schier,et al.  Prehabilitation: The next challenge for anaesthesia teams. , 2020, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[9]  F. Sniehotta,et al.  Exploring patient attitudes to behaviour change before surgery to reduce peri‐operative risk: preferences for short‐ vs. long‐term behaviour change , 2019, Anaesthesia.

[10]  C. Grimmett,et al.  Psychological factors, prehabilitation and surgical outcomes: evidence and future directions , 2019, Anaesthesia.

[11]  H. Zeeb,et al.  Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Improving Glycemic Control in Persons with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression Analysis. , 2018, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  E. Skovlund,et al.  Post-discharge complications in frail older patients after surgery for colorectal cancer. , 2018, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  F. Carli,et al.  Effects of Nutritional Prehabilitation, With and Without Exercise, on Outcomes of Patients Who Undergo Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2018, Gastroenterology.

[14]  R. Skipworth,et al.  Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[15]  G. Tew,et al.  Clinical guideline and recommendations on pre‐operative exercise training in patients awaiting major non‐cardiac surgery , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[16]  J Wilson,et al.  Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET): consensus clinical guidelines on indications, organization, conduct, and physiological interpretation. , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  M. Grocott,et al.  Fit for surgery? Perspectives on preoperative exercise testing and training , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  Bianca C. Reisdorf,et al.  The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion , 2017, New Media Soc..

[19]  R. Pearse,et al.  Frequency of surgical treatment and related hospital procedures in the UK: a national ecological study using hospital episode statistics , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  H. S. King,et al.  Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  Tej D. Azad,et al.  Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes , 2015, The Lancet.

[22]  J. Kirchner,et al.  A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project , 2015, Implementation Science.

[23]  L. Yardley,et al.  The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  T. Thomsen,et al.  Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  G. Lewith,et al.  Developing Digital Interventions: A Methodological Guide , 2014, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[26]  J. Tolstrup,et al.  Preoperative Alcohol Consumption and Postoperative Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[27]  Susan L Ettner,et al.  Association Between Occurrence of a Postoperative Complication and Readmission: Implications for Quality Improvement and Cost Savings , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[28]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[29]  S. Michie,et al.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[30]  J. Vincent,et al.  EuSOS: European surgical outcomes study. , 2011, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[31]  M. V. van Stralen,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[32]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies , 2010, Psychology & health.

[33]  Cynthia D Mulrow,et al.  Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[34]  P. Williamson,et al.  Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. , 2004, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[35]  A. Scavarda Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1986 .

[36]  Howard A. Rockman,et al.  Clinical Medicine , 1915, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[37]  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) , 2019, The Grants Register 2020.

[38]  M. Grandner Sleep, Health, and Society. , 2017, Sleep medicine clinics.