Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature from 1998 to 2012.

[1]  J. Craig,et al.  Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[2]  Christian B. van der Pol,et al.  Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates? , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  N. Pandis,et al.  Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  J. Wolf,et al.  The future of clinical practice guidelines in urology. , 2011, European urology.

[6]  P. Dahm,et al.  Introduction to a new series: advanced topics in evidence-based urologic oncology. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[7]  J. Wolf,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines to inform evidence-based clinical practice , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[8]  P. Dahm,et al.  Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[9]  P. Dahm,et al.  Evidence‐based urology in practice: publication bias , 2010, BJU international.

[10]  K. Dickersin.  To Reform U.S. Health Care, Start with Systematic Reviews , 2010, Science.

[11]  P. Dahm,et al.  Evidence‐based urology in practice: heterogeneity in a systematic review meta‐analysis , 2010, BJU international.

[12]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  M. Faraday,et al.  Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the recommendations of the American Urological Association , 2009, BJU international.

[14]  Philipp Dahm,et al.  How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[15]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) , 2007, PloS one.

[16]  Thomas McGinn,et al.  Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic) , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[17]  M. O. Sharif,et al.  Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. , 2013, Oral health and dental management.

[18]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.