Advanced imaging of bone macro and micro structure.

In the past decade, considerable progress has been made in the development of methods for assessing the skeleton noninvasively so that osteoporosis can be detected early, its progression and response to therapy carefully monitored, or the risk of fracture effectively ascertained. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the peripheral, central, or entire skeleton as well as the trabecular or cortical bone envelopes, can now be evaluated with a high degree of accuracy and precision, and the strength of bone and the propensity to fracture can be reliably estimated. Noninvasive and/or nondestructive techniques are capable of providing macro or micro structural information about bone, beyond simple bone densitometry. While the latter provides important information about osteoporotic fracture risk, numerous studies indicate that bone strength is only partially explained by BMD. Quantitative assessment of macrostructural characteristics such as geometry, and microstructural features such as relative trabecular volume, trabecular spacing, and connectivity, may improve our ability to estimate bone strength. The methods available for quantitatively assessing macrostructure include (besides conventional radiographs, which are not considered in this review) computed tomography and particularly volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). Methods for assessing microstructure of trabecular bone noninvasively and/or nondestructively include high-resolution computed tomography (hrCT), micro computed tomography (mCT), high-resolution magnetic resonance (hrMR), and micro magnetic resonance (mMR). vQCT, hrCT, and hrMR are generally applicable in vivo, and mCT and mMR are principally applicable in vitro.

[1]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[3]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Calcaneus: Age-Related Changes in Trabecular Structure and Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[4]  P. Croucher,et al.  Assessment of cancellous bone structure: Comparison of strut analysis, trabecular bone pattern factor, and marrow space star volume , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  E L Ritman,et al.  Micro-CT imaging of structure-to-function relationship of bone microstructure and associated vascular involvement. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[6]  F. Wehrli,et al.  High‐resolution variable flip angle 3D MR imaging of trabecular microstructure in vivo , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  M. Ito,et al.  Trabecular texture analysis of CT images in the relationship with spinal fracture. , 1995, Radiology.

[8]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  C. Simmons,et al.  Method‐Based Differences in the Automated Analysis of the Three‐Dimensional Morphology of Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular Bone Mineral and Calculated Structure of Human Bone Specimens Scanned by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography: Relation to Biomechanical Properties , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  Steven D. Kugelmass,et al.  Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  H. Genant,et al.  Image-Based Assessment of Spinal Trabecular Bone Structure from High-Resolution CT Images , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Bone.

[17]  K Engelke,et al.  A digital model of trabecular bone , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  M. Jergas,et al.  Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X‐ray absorptiometry , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  F. Wehrli,et al.  Three‐dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging of trabecular bone , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  U. Bonse,et al.  3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 microns spatial and 10(-4) energy resolution. , 1994, Bone and mineral.

[21]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. , 1993, Bone.

[22]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of noninvasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of high-resolution computed tomography and histologic sections. , 1996, Bone.

[23]  Steven D. Kugelmass,et al.  Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Scott N. Hwang,et al.  Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength. , 1997, Medical physics.

[26]  M. Hahn,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Imaging of Bone Mineral Using Computed Microtomography: Comparison with Microradiography and Undecalcified Histologic Sections , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[27]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[29]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Analysis of mechanical properties of cancellous bone under conditions of simulated bone atrophy. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three‐dimensional structural properties of noninvasive bone biopsies using 3D‐pQCT , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[33]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  江橋 節郎,et al.  Handbook on synchrotron radiation , 1983 .

[35]  J. Kinney,et al.  In vivo, three‐dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[36]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[37]  H. Song,et al.  Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. , 1998, Radiology.

[38]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo High Resolution MRI of the Calcaneus: Differences in Trabecular Structure in Osteoporosis Patients , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[39]  Martin Heller,et al.  Hochauflösende Darstellung und Quantifizierung der trabekulären Knochenstruktur der Fingerphalangen mit der Magnetresonanztomographie , 1997 .

[40]  J. Kinney,et al.  Intermittent treatment with human parathyroid hormone (hPTH[1‐34]) increased trabecular bone volume but not connectivity in osteopenic rats , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.