Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

High breast density as measured on mammograms is a strong risk factor for breast cancer in the general population, but its effect in carriers of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is unclear. We obtained mammograms from 206 female carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, 96 of whom were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer and 136 relatives of carriers who were themselves noncarriers. We compared the mammographic densities of affected carriers (cases) and unaffected carriers (controls), and of mutation carriers and noncarriers, using a computer-assisted method of measurement and visual assessment by two observers. Analyses were adjusted for age, parity, body mass index, menopausal status, and hormone replacement therapy use. There was no difference in the mean percent density between noncarriers and carriers. Among carriers, increasing mammographic density was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (P(trend) = 0.024). The odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval) for breast cancer associated with a density of > or =50% was 2.29 (1.23-4.26; P = 0.009). The OR did not differ between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers or between premenopausal and postmenopausal carriers. The results suggest that the distribution of breast density in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers is similar to that in non-carriers. High breast density in carriers is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, with the relative risk being similar to that observed in the general population. Use of mammographic density could improve individual risk prediction in carriers.

[1]  N. Boyd,et al.  Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  U. Ikeda,et al.  Statins and monocytes , 1999, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Warren,et al.  Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[4]  S. Duffy,et al.  High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  A. Morrison,et al.  Diet, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  R. Warren Hormones and mammographic breast density. , 2004, Maturitas.

[7]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[8]  S. Duffy,et al.  High risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and diet: a case–control study , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Breast density and breast cancer risk factors in a high-risk population. , 2003, Breast.

[11]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  J. Hopper,et al.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  Ikuko Kato,et al.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States) , 1995, Cancer Causes & Control.

[14]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[16]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer natural history--a case-control study. , 2001, Acta oncologica.

[19]  Zhimin Huo,et al.  Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. , 2002, Radiology.

[20]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Navin Parekh,et al.  Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States) , 2001, Cancer Causes & Control.

[22]  James J Dignam,et al.  Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[24]  B. Geller,et al.  A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[25]  M. Hakama,et al.  Risk of breast cancer and changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns over time. , 1998, Acta oncologica.

[26]  A. Morrison,et al.  Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[27]  Theo van der Kwast,et al.  A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false‐negative mammography , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[28]  N F Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Breast disease.

[29]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  M. Berer Mammography in Asian patients with BRCA1 mutations , 1999, The Lancet.

[31]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[32]  J. Chang-Claude,et al.  A weighted cohort approach for analysing factors modifying disease risks in carriers of high‐risk susceptibility genes , 2005, Genetic epidemiology.

[33]  Opper,et al.  HERITABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY, A RISK FACTOR FOR BREAST CANCER , 2002 .

[34]  B. Weber,et al.  Mammography of breast carcinoma in women who have mutations of the breast cancer gene BRCA1: initial experience. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.