PII: S0042-6989(01)00209-7

The angular dependence of precision measurements is well established as the oblique effect in motion perception. Recently, it has been shown that the visual system also exhibits anisotropic behaviour with respect to accuracy of the absolute direction of motion of random dot fields. This study aimed to investigate whether this angular dependent, directional bias is a general phenomenon of motion perception. Our results demonstrate, for single translating tilted lines viewed foveally, an extraordinary illusion with perceptual deviations of up to 35° from veridical. Not only is the magnitude of these deviations substantially larger than that for random dots, but the general pattern of the illusion is also different from that found for dot fields. Significant differences in the bias, as a function of line tilt and line length, suggest that the illusion does not result from fixed inaccuracies of the visual system in the computation of direction of motion. Potential sources for these large biases are motion integration mechanisms. These were also found to be anisotropic. The anisotropic nature and the surprisingly large magnitude of the effect make it a necessary consideration in analyses of motion experiments and in modelling studies. © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[2]  DAVID ALAIS,et al.  The Size and Number of Plaid Blobs Mediate the Misperception of Type-II Plaid Direction , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Inhomogeneity and anisotropies for motion detection in the monocular visual field of human observers , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  Mercedes Barchilon Ben-Av,et al.  Disambiguating velocity estimates across image space , 1995, Vision Research.

[5]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[6]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  Jeounghoon Kim,et al.  Direction repulsion between components in motion transparency , 1996, Vision Research.

[8]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Directional acuity for drifting plaids , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Blake,et al.  Memory for visual motion. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  A two-dimensional analysis of direction-specific adaptation , 1980, Vision Research.

[12]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Meridional anisotropies of orientation discrimination for sine wave gratings , 1988, Vision Research.

[14]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Masking of motion by broadband and filtered directional noise , 1979 .

[16]  R. Blake,et al.  Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect , 1993, Vision Research.

[17]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[18]  Gunter Loffler.  The integration of motion signals across space. , 1999 .

[19]  Temporal Integration. , 1958, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[20]  B. L. Gros,et al.  Anisotropies in visual motion perception: a fresh look. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: Explorations in cooperativity , 1990, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Wuerger,et al.  Perception of Moving Lines: Interactions Between Local Perpendicular Signals and 2D Motion Signals , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions , 1984, Vision Research.

[26]  H R Wilson,et al.  A model for motion coherence and transparency , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[28]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon? , 1999, Vision Research.

[29]  H. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns , 1990, Vision Research.

[30]  Terry Caelli,et al.  Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain , 1983, Vision Research.

[31]  S. M. Axstis.  PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS , 1970 .

[32]  R. Blake,et al.  Misdirected visual motion in the peripheral visual field , 1992, Vision Research.

[33]  L. Bowns.  Evidence for a Feature Tracking Explanation of Why Type II Plaids Move in the Vector Sum Direction at Short Durations , 1996, Vision Research.

[34]  O. Braddick,et al.  The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals , 1991, Vision Research.

[35]  Nancy J. Coletta,et al.  An oblique effect in parafoveal motion perception , 1993, Vision Research.

[36]  Hans Wallach.  Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[37]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Reference Repulsion When Judging the Direction of Visual Motion , 1998, Perception.

[38]  D. Robinson.  The mechanics of human smooth pursuit eye movement. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.