Diffusion and partition of solutes in cartilage under static load.

We describe experimental apparatus, methodology and mathematical algorithms to measure diffusion and partition for typical small ionic solutes and inulin (a medium size solute) in statically loaded cartilage. The partition coefficient based on tissue water (K(H(2)O)) of Na(+) increased from 1.8 to 4.5 and for SO(4)(-2) decreased from 0.5 to 0.1, when the applied pressure was raised from zero to 22 atm K(H(2)O) of inulin decreased from 0.3 to 0.05, for an increase in pressure from zero to 11 atm. Our theoretical interpretation of the results is that the partition coefficient can be expressed as a function of fixed charge density (FCD) for both loaded and unloaded cartilage. The partition coefficient shows good agreement with the ideal Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium, particularly when FCD is based on extrafibrillar water (EFW). The diffusion coefficients, D also decreased with an increase in applied pressure; raising the pressure from 0 to 22 atm resulted in the following changes in the values of D: for Na(+) from 2.86 x 10(-6) to 1.51 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s, for SO(4)(-2) from 1.58 x 10(-6) to 7.5 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s, for leucine from 1.69 x 10(-6) to 8.30 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s and for inulin from 1.80 x 10(-7) to 3.30 x 10(-8) cm(2)/s. For the three small solutes (two charged and one neutral) the diffusion coefficient D is highly correlated with the fraction of fluid volume in the tissue. These experimental results show good agreement with the simple model of Mackie and Meares: hence solute charge does not affect the diffusion of small solutes under load. For inulin D & K show some agreement with a modified Ogston model based on two major components, viz., glycosaminoglycans (GAG) and core protein. We conclude that the changes in the partition and diffusion coefficients of small and medium size solutes in statically loaded cartilage can be interpreted as being due to the reduction in hydration and increase in FCD. The change in the latter affects the partition of small ionic solutes and the partition and diffusion of larger molecules. Our results throw light on the ionic environment of chondrocytes in loaded cartilage as well as on the transport of solutes through the matrix.

[1]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Methods in cartilage research , 1990 .

[2]  R. C. Weast.  Handbook of chemistry and physics , 1973 .

[3]  T. Hardingham,et al.  The molecular basis of the solution properties of hyaluronan investigated by confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[4]  A. Maroudas.  Distribution and diffusion of solutes in articular cartilage. , 1970, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Mizrahi,et al.  Swelling Pressure of Cartilage: Roles Played by Proteoglycans and Collagen , 1992 .

[6]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Balance between swelling pressure and collagen tension in normal and degenerate cartilage , 1976, Nature.

[7]  A. G. Ogston,et al.  The spaces in a uniform random suspension of fibres , 1958 .

[8]  C. P. Winlove,et al.  The theoretical distributions and diffusivities of small ions in chondroitin sulphate and hyaluronate. , 1988, Biophysical chemistry.

[9]  F. Crick,et al.  X-Ray Analysis and Protein Structure , 1957 .

[10]  M. A. R. Freeman,et al.  Adult Articular Cartilage , 1973 .

[11]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Transport of solutes through cartilage: permeability to large molecules. , 1976, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  C. P. Winlove,et al.  The distributions and diffusivities of small ions in chondroitin sulphate, hyaluronate and some proteoglycan solutions , 1988 .

[13]  Charles Tanford,et al.  Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules , 1961 .

[14]  T M Quinn,et al.  Static compression is associated with decreased diffusivity of dextrans in cartilage explants. , 2000, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[15]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Further studies on the composition of human femoral head cartilage. , 1980, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[16]  J. D. Wells,et al.  On the transport of compact particles through solutions of chain-polymers , 1973, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[17]  D. Burstein,et al.  Diffusion of small solutes in cartilage as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  T. Hardingham,et al.  Macromolecular diffusion of biological polymers measured by confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[19]  E. Wachtel,et al.  The effect of osmotic and mechanical pressures on water partitioning in articular cartilage. , 1991, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  L. Schanker,et al.  Diffusion coefficients of some 14 C-labeled saccharides of biological interest. , 1971, Life sciences. Pt. 2: Biochemistry, general and molecular biology.

[21]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Sulphate diffusion and incorporation into human articular cartilage , 1974 .

[22]  G E Kempson,et al.  Mechanical properties of articular cartilage. , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  P J Basser,et al.  Mechanical properties of the collagen network in human articular cartilage as measured by osmotic stress technique. , 1998, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[24]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[25]  D. L. Maude.  A simple physicochemical micromethod for determining fixed anionic groups in connective tissue. , 1970 .

[26]  R. Schneiderman,et al.  Insulin-like growth factor-I and its complexes in normal human articular cartilage: studies of partition and diffusion. , 1995, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.