From Nobel Prize to Project Management: Getting Risks Right

A major source of risk in project management is inaccurate forecasts of project costs, demand, and other impacts. The paper presents a promising new approach to mitigating such risk based on theories of decision-making under uncertainty, which won the 2002 Nobel Prize in economics. First, the paper documents inaccuracy and risk in project management. Second, it explains inaccuracy in terms of optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation. Third, the theoretical basis is presented for a promising new method called “reference class forecasting,” which achieves accuracy by basing forecasts on actual performance in a reference class of comparable projects and thereby bypassing both optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation. Fourth, the paper presents the first instance of practical reference class forecasting, which concerns cost forecasts for large transportation infrastructure projects. Finally, potentials for and barriers to reference class forecasting are assessed.

[1]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[2]  P. Gordon,et al.  The determinants of light-rail transit demand—An international cross-sectional comparison , 1984 .

[3]  Lawrence K. Vanston,et al.  Testing the Tea Leaves: Evaluating the Validity of Forecasts , 2004 .

[4]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?: The Case of Transportation , 2005, 1303.6654.

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures , 1982 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[7]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[9]  A. Nelson Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment , 2004 .

[10]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Procedures for Dealing with Optimism Bias in Transport Planning , 2004 .

[11]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[13]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Ethics and Advocacy in Forecasting for Public Policy , 1990 .

[14]  Daniel Kahneman New challenges to the rationality assumption , 1994 .

[15]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects? , 2004, 1304.4476.

[16]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Design by Deception: The Politics of Megaproject Approval , 2005 .

[17]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[18]  J.H. Vanston,et al.  Testing the tea leaves: evaluating the validity of forecasts , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Delusions of success. How optimism undermines executives' decisions. , 2003, Harvard business review.