The clinical and cost effectiveness of remote expert wound nurse consultation for healing of pressure injuries among residential aged care patients: A protocol for a prospective pilot parallel cluster randomised controlled trial

Pressure injuries affect 1 to 46% of residents in aged care (long term) facilities and cause a substantial economic burden on health care systems. Remote expert wound nurse consultation has the potential to improve pressure injury outcomes; however, the clinical and cost effectiveness of this intervention for healing of pressure injuries in residential aged care require further investigation. We describe the remote expert wound nurse consultation intervention and the method of a prospective, pilot, cluster randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome is number of wounds healed. Secondary outcomes are wound healing rate, time to healing, wound infection, satisfaction, quality of life, cost of treatment and care, hospitalisations, and deaths. Intervention group participants receive the intervention over a 12-week period and all participants are monitored for 24 weeks. A wound imaging and measurement system is used to analyse pressure injury images. A feasibility and fidelity evaluation will be concurrently conducted. The results of the trial will inform the merit of and justification for a future definitive trial to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of remote expert wound nurse consultation for the healing of pressure injuries in residential aged care.

[1]  D. Margolis,et al.  Chronic wounds , 2022, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[2]  W. Chaboyer,et al.  Pressure injuries in Australian public hospitals: A cost of illness study. , 2022, International journal of nursing studies.

[3]  Wendy W. Chapman,et al.  Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework , 2022, Implementation Science.

[4]  A. Gefen,et al.  Our contemporary understanding of the aetiology of pressure ulcers/pressure injuries , 2021, International wound journal.

[5]  J. Guest,et al.  Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013 , 2020, BMJ Open.

[6]  W. Padula,et al.  Five‐layer border dressings as part of a quality improvement bundle to prevent pressure injuries in US skilled nursing facilities and Australian nursing homes: A cost‐effectiveness analysis , 2019, International wound journal.

[7]  W. Padula,et al.  The national cost of hospital‐acquired pressure injuries in the United States , 2019, International wound journal.

[8]  S. Kapp,et al.  The direct cost of pressure injuries in an Australian residential aged care setting , 2018, International wound journal.

[9]  Manish K. Mishra,et al.  Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis , 2018, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[10]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Using Economic Evaluation to Illustrate Value of Care for Improving Patient Safety and Quality: Choosing the Right Method. , 2017, Journal of patient safety.

[11]  Ling Jia Goh.  Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Distant Wound Care Advice towards Patient Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017 .

[12]  Jan Kottner,et al.  The epidemiology of skin conditions in the aged: A systematic review. , 2017, Journal of tissue viability.

[13]  M. Campbell,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[14]  G. Lancaster,et al.  How big should the pilot study for my cluster randomised trial be? , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Are Evidence-based Practices Associated With Effective Prevention of Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in US Academic Medical Centers? , 2016, Medical care.

[16]  M. Campbell,et al.  Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  Michael J Campbell,et al.  Pilot and feasibility studies: is there a difference from each other and from a randomised controlled trial? , 2014, Contemporary clinical trials.

[18]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  S. Chair,et al.  The impact on patient health and service outcomes of introducing nurse consultants: a historically matched controlled study , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[20]  Richard Norman,et al.  A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States , 2013, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

[21]  S. Kapp.  Successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines for pressure risk management in a home nursing setting. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[22]  Kevin D Frick,et al.  Microcosting Quantity Data Collection Methods , 2009, Medical care.

[23]  M. Weinstein,et al.  QALYs: the basics. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[24]  N. Santamaria,et al.  The effectiveness of digital imaging and remote expert wound consultation on healing rates in chronic lower leg ulcers in the Kimberley region of Western Australia , 2004 .