An object-oriented modeling framework for representing uncertainty in early variant design

This article presents a framework for the representation of uncertainty in the early design of complex adaptive products such as automobiles. The core of the framework is an object-oriented approach in which design objects and their inter-relationships may be modeled, and in which both the design attributes and the product structure may be uncertain. Relationship objects allow product variants and design alternatives to be represented. In addition to the design model, derivation methods for design attributes may be modeled, and methods may be incorporated to allow the deterministic or probabilistic computation of attributes. The modeling framework is the basis of a risk modeling tool, RiTo, in which Monte Carlo simulation is used to compute estimates for costs and other design attributes together with their probability of achievement in the final design. Uncertainties may be aggregated and levels of uncertainty in different parts of the model may be continually analysed and assessed. The framework also provides a mechanism for accumulating product knowledge, in particular knowledge concerning relationships between elements of part and assembly models, product volumes and manufacturing considerations.

[1]  Moon Jung Chung,et al.  Managing engineering data for complex products , 1995 .

[2]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  An object-oriented design model incorporating uncertainty for early risk assessment , 1995 .

[3]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[4]  Fujun Wang,et al.  CADOM: A Component Agent-based Design-Oriented Model for Collaborative Design , 1999 .

[5]  Alison McKay A FRAMEWORK FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION OF PRODUCT STRUCTURES , 1997 .

[6]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  A network approach to parametric design integration , 1996 .

[7]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[8]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Probabilistic-Based Design Model for Achieving Flexibility in Design , 1999 .

[9]  Peter Leibl Cost Calculation with a Feature-based CAD System using Modules for Calculation, Comparison and Forecast , 1999 .

[10]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Fuzzing ratings for multiattribute design decision-making , 1994 .

[11]  Ca McMahon,et al.  An approach to reliability analysis using the response surface method and Monte Carlo simulation , 1999 .

[12]  C. A. McMahon,et al.  CADCAM: Principles, Practice and Manufacturing Management , 1999 .

[13]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  MODELING CONFIGURABLE PRODUCT FAMILIES , 1998 .

[14]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Computations with Imprecise Parameters in Engineering Design: Background and Theory , 1989 .

[15]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Framework for Modeling Dependencies in Collaborative Engineering Processes , 1999 .

[16]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  NODES: a numerical and object based modelling system for conceptual engineering design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  Jon H Sims Williams,et al.  Survey of current practice in managing design risk , 1998 .

[18]  Alison McKay,et al.  Relating product definition and product variety , 1996 .

[19]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Information models for use in product design: a comparison , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[20]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes , 1991 .

[21]  Erik K. Antonsson,et al.  Imprecision in Engineering Design , 1995 .