The accuracy of reported sensitive sexual behaviour in Britain: exploring the extent of change 1990–2000

Objectives: The 1990–1 British national probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal 1990) was repeated in 1999–2001 (Natsal 2000) to update population estimates of risk behaviours, and assess change over time. We examine whether changes in prevalence estimates may partly result from changes in measurement accuracy. Methods: Taking Natsal 2000 (11 161 respondents) and Natsal 1990 (13 765 respondents aged 16–44) we compared the response rate, sample representativeness, reporting of abortion last year (relative to official statistics), and selected attitudes. Among the common birth cohort eligible for both surveys (aged 16–34 Natsal 1990, 26–44 Natsal 2000), we compared reporting of experiences before 1990. Results: The response rate (66.8% Natsal 1990, 65.4% Natsal 2000) and completeness of reporting abortion were unchanged (84% Natsal 1990, 86% Natsal 2000). Attitudes were significantly changed in Natsal 2000 relative to Natsal 1990—for example, increased tolerance of male homosexual sex, OR (95% CI) 2.10 (1.93–2.29) men and 2.95 (2.74 to 3.18) women. In the common birth cohort reporting of heterosexual intercourse before 16 (OR 1.15 (1.02 to 1.29) men, 1.49 (1.31 to 1.69) women), and homosexual experience (OR 1.80 (1.46 to 2.21) men, 2.00 (1.61 to 2.48) women) were significantly increased. Conclusions: The results are consistent with improved reporting accuracy for some sensitive behaviours in Natsal 2000, in line with greater social tolerance and improved survey methodology. However, the evidence is not conclusive, and may not be generalisable to all such behaviours. The increase found in the reported prevalence of STI risk behaviours between Natsal 1990 and Natsal 2000 is likely to be somewhat overstated.

[1]  A. Park.  The Generation Game , 2000 .

[2]  Martin Jones.  Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles , 1994 .

[3]  K. Wellings,et al.  What's in a Mean? -an Examination of the Inconsistency between Men and Women in Reporting Sexual Partnerships , 1996 .

[4]  Alfred C. Kinsey,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1949 .

[5]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  Kaye Wellings,et al.  Sexual lifestyles and HIV risk , 1992, Nature.

[7]  Wendy Macdowall,et al.  Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Effect of computer-assisted self-interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment , 2001, AIDS.

[9]  Raymond M. Lee,et al.  Doing Research on Sensitive Topics , 1993 .

[10]  K Wellings,et al.  Methodology of the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. , 1993, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A,.

[11]  Michael Billington.  One Night Stands , 1993 .

[12]  D. De Angelis,et al.  Assessing the impact of national anti-HIV sexual health campaigns: trends in the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in England , 2001, Sexually transmitted infections.

[13]  Wendy Macdowall,et al.  Sexual behaviour in Britain: early heterosexual experience , 2001, The Lancet.

[14]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research , 2001, Sexually transmitted infections.

[15]  P. Redfern,et al.  Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, The , 2004 .

[16]  S. M. Rogers,et al.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. , 1998, Science.

[17]  E. M. Holmes,et al.  SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR IN THE HUMAN MALE , 1948 .

[18]  Alfred C. Kinsey,et al.  Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female , 1954, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[19]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Assessing participation bias in a sexual behaviour survey: implications for measuring HIV risk , 1997, AIDS.