Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test

Abstract This study aimed to develop a finite element model to simulate the geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement structure by taking into account the lateral confinement effect of geogrid layer, the interaction between geogrid and aggregate/soil, and the nonlinear cross-anisotropy of geogrid-reinforced unbound granular material (UGM). First, an analytical model was proposed to quantify the effect of the lateral confinement of geogrid layer on the resilient modulus of UGM. By comparing to the laboratory triaxial test results, the developed analytical model was proven to accurately predict the resilient modulus of geogrid-reinforced UGM. Second, the Goodman interface element model was used to characterize the contact behavior of geogrid-aggregate/soil interface. In order to simulate the nonlinear cross-anisotropic behavior of geogrid-reinforced UGM, a user-defined material (UMAT) subroutine was programmed using the secant modulus approach. The accuracy of the developed UMAT was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results to the analytical solutions in a virtual triaxial test. Two pairs of geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pavement models were analyzed in this study. It was found that the geogrid reinforcement is effective in mitigating the rutting damage of base course and subgrade, but cannot significantly extend the fatigue life of flexible pavement. The geogrid reinforced in the middle of the base course is better at reducing the rutting damage of base course than that placed at the base/subgrade interface. However, the geogrid reinforcement is much more effective in reducing the rutting damage of the subgrade when it is placed at the bottom of the base course. A comprehensive large-scale tank (LST) testing program was designed to record the critical pavement responses, including the surface deflection, the tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt concrete, and the vertical stresses in base course and subgrade. The developed geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced finite element models were finally validated by comparing the model predictions with those measurements from the LST test.

[1]  R. Lytton,et al.  Impact of Geogrid on Cross-Anisotropy and Permanent Deformation of Unbound Granular Materials , 2016 .

[2]  Keith Hjelmstad,et al.  ANALYSIS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RESILIENT MODULUS MODELS FOR GRANULAR SOLIDS , 2000 .

[3]  Jie Han,et al.  Performance of Triangular Aperture Geogrid-Reinforced Base Courses over Weak Subgrade under Cyclic Loading , 2013 .

[4]  R. Lytton,et al.  Estimation of Resilient Modulus of Unbound Aggregates Using Performance-Related Base Course Properties , 2015 .

[5]  Jie Han,et al.  Analytical Model for Resilient Modulus and Permanent Deformation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Unbound Granular Material , 2013 .

[6]  S. F. Brown,et al.  Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates , 2006 .

[7]  D. Fratta,et al.  Evaluation of the Zone of Influence and Stiffness Improvement from Geogrid Reinforcement in Granular Materials , 2009 .

[8]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Geogrid in Flexible Pavements , 2008 .

[9]  Erol Tutumluer.  Predicting behavior of flexible pavements with granular bases , 1995 .

[10]  S W Perkins,et al.  A Synthesis and Evaluation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Base Layers in Flexible Pavements- Part II , 1997 .

[11]  Rong Luo,et al.  Development of a New Mechanistic Empirical Rutting Model for Unbound Granular Material , 2016 .

[12]  M. D. Bolton,et al.  Discussion: The strength and dilatancy of sands , 1987 .

[13]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Nonlinear Pavement Foundation Modeling for Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Flexible Pavements , 2007 .

[14]  Ralph Haas,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF GRANULAR BASES IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 1988 .

[15]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Cross-Anisotropic Characterization of Unbound Granular Materials , 2001 .

[16]  Yu Qian,et al.  Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior at different levels of degradation through triaxial shear strength test and discrete element modeling , 2015 .

[17]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Development of a mechanistic model for geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements , 2005 .

[18]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Anisotropic Modeling of Granular Bases in Flexible Pavements , 1997 .

[19]  Richard E. Goodman,et al.  CLOSURE ON A MODEL FOR THE MECHANICS OF JOINTED ROCK , 1968 .

[20]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Aggregate base residual stresses affecting geogrid reinforced flexible pavement response , 2008 .

[21]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Importance of Nonlinear Anisotropic Modeling of Granular Base for Predicting Maximum Viscoelastic Pavement Responses under Moving Vehicular Loading , 2013 .

[22]  S W Perkins.  EVALUATION OF GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SYSTEMS USING TWO PAVEMENT TEST FACILITIES , 2002 .

[23]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Modeling of Pavement Response using Nonlinear Cross-Anisotropy Approach , 2006 .

[24]  S. W. Perkins,et al.  MECHANICAL RESPONSE OF GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 1999 .