Gaining Insights from Sociolinguistic Style Analysis for Redesign of Conversational Agent Based Support for Collaborative Learning

Data from an early stage of development of conversational agent based support for collaborative learning provides an ideal resource for demonstrating the value of sociolinguistic style analysis paired with time series visualizations as part of an iterative design process. The methodology illustrated in this chapter was introduced in earlier publications focusing separately on the sociolinguistic style analysis (Howley and Rose, Modeling the rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In: HCII’11 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction: interaction techniques and environments, pp 341–350, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011; Howley et al., A multivocal process analysis of social positioning in study groups. In: Suthers et al. (eds). Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, Springer, 2013) and the time series visualization using the Tatiana tool (Dyke et al., Challenging assumptions: using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes. In: Proceedings of the international conference of the learning sciences. Sydney, Australia, 2012). However this chapter is unique in its application to data that is at such an early stage in a development process. The data is admittedly raw, and contains many examples of interaction gone awry. Nevertheless, the value in this analysis is in a demonstration of what insights can be gained through detailed stylistic analysis of conversational behavior that informs the next steps of intervention development.

[1]  M. Berkowitz,et al.  Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. , 1983 .

[2]  Stephanie D. Teasley Talking about reasoning : How important is the peer in peer collaboration? , 1997 .

[3]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes , 2002 .

[4]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[5]  David Rose,et al.  Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause , 2003 .

[6]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  An Evaluation of a Hybrid Language Understanding Approach for Robust Selection of Tutoring Goals , 2002, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[7]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English , 2005 .

[8]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[9]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Providing support for adaptive scripting in an on-line collaborative learning environment , 2006, CHI.

[10]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate in a Computer-mediated Setting: Observing a Model Beats Learning from Being Scripted , 2006, ICLS.

[11]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[12]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[13]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Fading scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of distributed monitoring , 2007, CSCL.

[14]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[15]  C. Rosé,et al.  Missing Something? Authority in Collaborative Learning , 2011, CSCL.

[16]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Modeling the Rhetoric of Human-Computer Interaction , 2011, HCI.

[17]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Architecture for Building Conversational Agents that Support Collaborative Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[18]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Coordinating Multi-dimensional Support in Collaborative Conversational Agents , 2012, ITS.

[19]  L. Resnick,et al.  A framework for analyzing development of argumentation through classroom discussions , 2012 .

[20]  B. McLaren,et al.  Educational Technologies for Teaching Argumentation Skills , 2012 .

[21]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Towards Academically Productive Talk Supported by Conversational Agents , 2012, ITS.

[22]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  The international handbook of collaborative learning , 2013 .

[23]  N. Law,et al.  Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions , 2013 .

[24]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Measuring prevalence of other-oriented transactive contributions using an automated measure of speech style accommodation , 2013, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[25]  Iris K. Howley,et al.  Linguistic Analysis Methods for Studying Small Groups , 2013 .

[26]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Enhancing Scientific Reasoning and Discussion with Conversational Agents , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[27]  C. Rosé,et al.  A Multivocal Process Analysis of Social Positioning in Study Groups , 2013 .

[28]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Impact of CSCL Beyond the Online Environment , 2013, CSCL.

[29]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Intensification of Group Knowledge Exchange with Academically Productive Talk Agents , 2013, CSCL.

[30]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Triggering effective social support for online groups , 2014, TIIS.