Interpreting behaviors from accelerometry: a method combining simplicity and objectivity

Abstract Quantifying the behavior of motile, free‐ranging animals is difficult. The accelerometry technique offers a method for recording behaviors but interpretation of the data is not straightforward. To date, analysis of such data has either involved subjective, study‐specific assignments of behavior to acceleration data or the use of complex analyses based on machine learning. Here, we present a method for automatically classifying acceleration data to represent discrete, coarse‐scale behaviors. The method centers on examining the shape of histograms of basic metrics readily derived from acceleration data to objectively determine threshold values by which to separate behaviors. Through application of this method to data collected on two distinct species with greatly differing behavioral repertoires, kittiwakes, and humans, the accuracy of this approach is demonstrated to be very high, comparable to that reported for other automated approaches already published. The method presented offers an alternative to existing methods as it uses biologically grounded arguments to distinguish behaviors, it is objective in determining values by which to separate these behaviors, and it is simple to implement, thus making it potentially widely applicable. The R script coding the method is provided.

[1]  Francis Daunt,et al.  A new method to quantify prey acquisition in diving seabirds using wing stroke frequency , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Tri-Axial Dynamic Acceleration as a Proxy for Animal Energy Expenditure; Should We Be Summing Values or Calculating the Vector? , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Emily L. C. Shepard,et al.  Identification of imperial cormorant Phalacrocorax atriceps behaviour using accelerometers , 2009 .

[4]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Excess Baggage for Birds: Inappropriate Placement of Tags on Gannets Changes Flight Patterns , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Roland Kays,et al.  Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior , 2013, Animal Biotelemetry.

[7]  Lewis G. Halsey,et al.  Measuring Energetics and Behaviour Using Accelerometry in Cane Toads Bufo marinus , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  Y. Ropert‐Coudert,et al.  Does Foraging Performance Change with Age in Female Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor)? , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Akinori Takahashi,et al.  Linking animal-borne video to accelerometers reveals prey capture variability , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Steven J. Portugal,et al.  Recording raptor behavior on the wing via accelerometry , 2009 .

[11]  S. Wanless,et al.  Can Ethograms Be Automatically Generated Using Body Acceleration Data from Free-Ranging Birds? , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  INTRODUCTION The coming of age of marine ornithology , 2012 .

[13]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Predicting multiple behaviors from GPS radiocollar cluster data , 2015 .

[14]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  E. Rezende,et al.  Effects of Size, Sex, and Voluntary Running Speeds on Costs of Locomotion in Lines of Laboratory Mice Selectively Bred for High Wheel‐Running Activity , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[16]  Y. Bhatnagar,et al.  Habitat shift and time budget of the Tibetan argali: the influence of livestock grazing , 2006, Ecological Research.

[17]  E. Shepard.  Identification of animal movement patterns using tri-axial accelerometry , 2008 .

[18]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Trends and perspectives in animal‐attached remote sensing , 2005 .

[19]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Creating a behavioural classification module for acceleration data: using a captive surrogate for difficult to observe species , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Nobuaki Arai,et al.  Use of a gyroscope/accelerometer data logger to identify alternative feeding behaviours in fish , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  K. Yoda,et al.  A new technique for monitoring the behaviour of free-ranging Adélie penguins. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Robin Freeman,et al.  Behavioural mapping of a pelagic seabird: combining multiple sensors and a hidden Markov model reveals the distribution of at-sea behaviour , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  Michael Scantlebury,et al.  Tri-axial accelerometers quantify behaviour in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): towards an automated interpretation of field data , 2014, Animal Biotelemetry.

[24]  K. Yoda,et al.  Temporal changes in activity budgets of chick-rearing Adélie penguins , 2007 .

[25]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals , 2008 .

[26]  Ian Jonsen,et al.  Supervised accelerometry analysis can identify prey capture by penguins at sea , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  Melissa S. Bowlin,et al.  Technology on the Move: Recent and Forthcoming Innovations for Tracking Migratory Birds , 2011 .

[28]  Gabriel Hugh Elkaim,et al.  Instantaneous energetics of puma kills reveal advantage of felid sneak attacks , 2014, Science.

[29]  Tomonori Hiraishi,et al.  Monitoring the spawning behaviour of chum salmon with an acceleration data logger , 2006 .

[30]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Identification of Behaviour in Freely Moving Dogs (Canis familiaris) Using Inertial Sensors , 2013, PloS one.

[31]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  King penguins adjust their diving behaviour with age , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Moving towards acceleration for estimates of activity-specific metabolic rate in free-living animals: the case of the cormorant. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[33]  Stephen Lemos,et al.  A New Technique , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[34]  R. J. Spivey,et al.  Interpretation of body-mounted accelerometry in flying animals and estimation of biomechanical power , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Love Thy Neighbour: Automatic Animal Behavioural Classification of Acceleration Data Using the K-Nearest Neighbour Algorithm , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Mike Walker,et al.  Black Petrels (Procellaria parkinsoni) Patrol the Ocean Shelf-Break: GPS Tracking of a Vulnerable Procellariiform Seabird , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  T. Guilford,et al.  Migration and stopover in a small pelagic seabird, the Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus: insights from machine learning , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[39]  Y. Naito,et al.  A fine-scale time budget of Cape gannets provides insights into the foraging strategies of coastal seabirds , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  K. Nagy,et al.  Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. , 1999, Annual review of nutrition.

[41]  W. Karasov,et al.  Daily Energy Expenditure and the Cost of Activity in Mammals , 1992 .

[42]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Making overall dynamic body acceleration work: on the theory of acceleration as a proxy for energy expenditure , 2011 .

[43]  P. Trathan,et al.  Heart rate and estimated energy expenditure of flapping and gliding in black-browed albatrosses , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  Patrick J Butler,et al.  Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.