Science Teachers’ Response to the Digital Education Revolution

We report a case study of two highly qualified science teachers as they implemented laptop computers in their Years 9 and 10 science classes at the beginning of the ‘Digital Education Revolution,’ Australia’s national one-to-one laptop program initiated in 2009. When a large-scale investment is made in a significant educational change, it is important to consider teachers perspectives and responses to such change and we draw from sociocultural perspectives for our analysis. Through interviews and classroom observations, our interpretive analysis identified four key tensions and contradictions. These include the following: (1) barriers to innovative science teaching; (2) maintaining classroom and school connectivity; (3) teacher versus student expectations; and (4) changes to classroom management. Analysis leads to implications for the future of this and similar programs. The study shows that while these two teachers were committed to developing and delivering technology-rich science lessons, there were many factors that challenge how the implementation progressed. The findings from this study have implications for the continued engagement of teachers in this and other jurisdictions considering the introduction of one-to-one laptop programs.

[1]  C Paul Newhouse.  Transforming Schooling with Support from Portable Computing , 2008 .

[2]  Becky Herr Stephenson,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out , 2010 .

[3]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning , 1988 .

[4]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Technology, Culture, and Adaptive Minds: An Introduction , 2003 .

[5]  Sarah Hug,et al.  Teaching and Learning Physics in a 1:1 Laptop School , 2008 .

[6]  John Traxler.  Students and Mobile Devices , 2010 .

[7]  Brian Drayton,et al.  After Installation: Ubiquitous Computing and High School Science in Three Experienced, High-Technology Schools , 2010 .

[8]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Landscape of Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[9]  Anne Campbell,et al.  Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education : international perspectives and practical solutions , 2010 .

[10]  David L. Silvernail.  Laptops for All , 2008 .

[11]  Garry Hoban,et al.  Social media use among pre-service primary teachers , 2013 .

[12]  Sarah Hug,et al.  A Study of the 1:1 Laptop Program at the Denver School of Science & Technology. , 2007 .

[13]  Sarah Katherine Howard,et al.  Affect and acceptability: exploring teachers’ technology-related risk perceptions , 2011 .

[14]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[15]  Lori Holcomb,et al.  Results & Lessons Learned from1:1 Laptop Initiatives: A Collective Review , 2009 .

[16]  Jing Lei.  Conditions for Ubiquitous Computing: What Can Be Learned from a Longitudinal Study , 2010 .

[17]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Laptops and Literacy: Learning in the Wireless Classroom , 2006 .

[18]  S. Watkins.  The Young and the Digital: What the Migration to Social Network Sites, Games, and Anytime, Anywhere Media Means for Our Future , 2009 .

[19]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Understanding Chemistry Professors’ Use of Educational Technologies: An activity theoretical approach , 2008 .

[20]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[21]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[22]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Re/Making Identities in the Praxis of Urban Schooling: A Cultural Historical Perspective , 2004 .

[23]  Aviva Klieger,et al.  Integrating Laptop Computers into Classroom: Attitudes, Needs, and Professional Development of Science Teachers—A Case Study , 2010 .

[24]  Robert Evans,et al.  The Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and the Real-Life Problems of Innovation , 1996 .

[25]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  Ann Jones,et al.  Motivation and mobile devices: exploring the role of appropriation and coping strategies , 2007 .

[27]  R. Olstad,et al.  Effects of novelty‐reducing preparation on exploratory behavior and cognitive learning in a science museum setting , 1991 .

[28]  D. Light,et al.  Laptop Programs for Students , 2009, Science.

[29]  Robin D. Marion,et al.  The Interactions of Conceptions of Teaching Science and Environmental Factors to Produce Praxis in Three Novice Teachers of Science , 2010 .

[30]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Activity Theory and Higher Education: evaluating learning technologies , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  David L. Silvernail,et al.  The Impact of Maine's One-to-One Laptop Program on Middle School Teachers and Students , 2004 .

[32]  Kathryn Moyle,et al.  The Digital Education Revolution , 2008 .

[33]  Andrew A. Zucker,et al.  Teaching with Laptops , 2009 .

[34]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[35]  Keith B. Lucas,et al.  The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation , 1997 .

[36]  T. Wagner.  The Global Achievement Gap: Why Even Our Best Schools Don't Teach the New Survival Skills Our Children Need--and What We Can Do About It , 2008 .