Scattered radiation in projection X-raymammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

Breast cancer has a significant impact on the well-being of the female population both nationwide and worldwide. This has motivated the establishment of national breast screening programmes in most western countries, in order to reduce the mortality associated with this disease via early detection. X-ray mammography is considered the current gold standard technique for breast cancer detection in such screening programmes. However, this suffers from performance limitations due to tissue superposition which can either mimic or obscure malignant pathology. Therefore, alternative X-ray modalities, such as digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), which employs a series of X-ray projections at different (but limited) angles, are being explored in order to improve breast cancer detection rates. In all such X-ray based imaging methods, scattered photons produced deleterious effects on image quality to varying degrees. In order to model such scatter distribution, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations is often chosen as the default approach, and as such is used in this thesis to quantify its effects in X-ray mammography and DBT scenarios. Following validation on the use of the GEANT4 MC package for use in mammography, three commercially available full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems were simulated with their corresponding anti-scatter grids using a CDMAM geometry. It was observed that, for the particular geometry studied, the scattered radiation recorded at the detector was 17% using a linear anti-scatter grid design. However, this figure was reduced by a factor of three when employing a cellular anti-scatter grid geometry. In DBT geometries, scattered radiation is larger than in FFDM and, spatially, may vary more rapidly due to the absence of an anti-scatter grid. The excessively long times needed to run MC simulations (8-10 hours) for such analysis motivates the need for an alternative approach. A non-stationary kernel-based approach has thus been developed. It was found that using kernels based on breast thickness-only, can overestimate scatter radiation by more than 60% (compared to MC simulations) at the breast edge region. Simulation work presented here shows that this overestimation in scatter is largely due to the air gap between the lower curved breast edge and the image receptor. In this thesis, a more accurate scatter field estimator is proposed for use in DBT which not only considers the breast thickness and primary incidence angle, but also accounts for scatter exiting the breast edge region and traversing an air gap prior to absorption in the image receptor. This proposed approach has reduced such errors to an average error of 10% in scatter, and a maximum of 20% across the projected breast phantom, and has decreased the run-time ten-fold. Such an approach has potential applications in scatter correction methods in DBT, and as an efficient modelling tool in imaging system development and in evaluation of virtual clinical trials.

[1]  D. Rogers Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  D. Dance,et al.  Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[4]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array. , 2012, Medical physics.

[5]  Björn Cederström,et al.  Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  R Fahrig,et al.  Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies. , 1994, Medical physics.

[7]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  The value of scatter removal by a grid in full field digital mammography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables and graphs of atomic subshell and relaxation data derived from the LLNL Evaluated Atomic Data Library (EADL), Z=1-100 , 1991 .

[9]  J. Baró,et al.  PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter , 1995 .

[10]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Validation of a method to convert an image to appear as if acquired using a different digital detector , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[11]  C. Fox,et al.  Breast-cancer screening. , 1979, Lancet.

[12]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray scatter based on patient model from digital breast tomosynthesis , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  R. Kruger,et al.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.

[14]  Mats Danielsson,et al.  Measurements on a full-field digital mammography system with a photon counting crystalline silicon detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.2) , 1999 .

[16]  J. Boone,et al.  An analytical model of the scattered radiation distribution in diagnostic radiology. , 1988, Medical physics.

[17]  I. Sechopoulos,et al.  A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[18]  S. Zackrisson,et al.  The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[20]  J. Sempau,et al.  PENELOPE-2006: A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport , 2009 .

[21]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[22]  D R Dance,et al.  Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[23]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Simulation of image detectors in radiology for determination of scatter-to-primary ratios using Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNP/MCNPX. , 2010, Medical physics.

[24]  Jerry A. Thomas,et al.  Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  G. Tzanakos,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[27]  M. Chial,et al.  in simple , 2003 .

[28]  John M Boone,et al.  Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques. , 2002, Radiology.

[29]  Sander Oude Elberink,et al.  Accuracy and Resolution of Kinect Depth Data for Indoor Mapping Applications , 2012, Sensors.

[30]  P. Rodrigues,et al.  Geant4 applications and developments for medical physics experiments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[31]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. , 2011, Medical physics.

[32]  Ingrid Reiser,et al.  A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom. , 2012, Medical physics.

[33]  J Jacobs,et al.  Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[34]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  John M Boone,et al.  Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[36]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[37]  S. M. Brady,et al.  A model of primary and scattered photon fluence for mammographic x-ray image quantification , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .

[39]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Automated and Human Determination of Threshold Contrast for Digital Mammography Systems , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[40]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  A fast scatter field estimator for digital breast tomosynthesis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[41]  J A Seibert,et al.  Characterization of the point spread function and modulation transfer function of scattered radiation using a digital imaging system. , 1986, Medical physics.

[42]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Alaleh Rashidnasab,et al.  Modeling realistic breast lesions using diffusion limited aggregation , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[44]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Investigation of physical processes in digital x-ray tomosynthesis imaging of the breast. , 2007 .

[45]  M. Anjos,et al.  Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio in soil CT-imaging , 2001 .

[46]  I. I. Rushakov,et al.  Computed Tomography , 2019, Compendium of Biomedical Instrumentation.

[47]  S. Webb The Physics of Medical Imaging , 1990 .

[48]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[49]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  EPDL97: the evaluated photo data library `97 version , 1997 .

[50]  Idris Elbakri,et al.  Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[51]  C. W. Nestor,et al.  X-ray fluorescence cross sections for K and L x rays of the elements , 1978 .

[52]  Stephen M. Seltzer,et al.  Tables and Graphs of Electron-Interaction Cross Sections from 10 eV to 100 GeV Derived from the LLNL Evaluated Data Library (EEDL), Z=1-100 | NIST , 1991 .

[53]  Yves Lemoigne,et al.  Physics for medical imaging applications , 2007 .

[54]  M. R. Patel,et al.  Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[55]  U Neitzel,et al.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[56]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[57]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[58]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Evaluation of scattering in cone-beam breast computed tomography: A Monte Carlo and experimental phantom study , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[59]  Feijo Pery Vidal,et al.  Geant4 validation on mammography applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[60]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[61]  Dermott E. Cullen,et al.  A simple model of photon transport , 1995 .

[62]  J. Baker,et al.  Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis. , 2009, Radiology.

[63]  O. Gonçalves,et al.  Evaluation of the influence of scattering profiles on the resolution, scatter/primary ratio, and grid performance in mammography , 2001 .

[64]  D Granero,et al.  Phantom size in brachytherapy source dosimetric studies. , 2004, Medical physics.

[65]  D R Dance,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[66]  K Bliznakova,et al.  A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[67]  A. Naqvi,et al.  Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography. , 2009, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[68]  K. Amako,et al.  Comparison of Geant4 electromagnetic physics models against the NIST reference data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[69]  Stefan Fiedler,et al.  Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[70]  Per Skaane,et al.  Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.

[71]  John M. Boone,et al.  Computed Tomography for Imaging the Breast , 2006, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[72]  D R Dance,et al.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[73]  Maria Grazia Pia,et al.  A powerful simulation tool for medical physics applications: Geant4 , 2003 .

[74]  D. Dance Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[75]  Tomás Pajdla,et al.  3D with Kinect , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops).

[76]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[77]  P. Shikhaliev Energy-resolved computed tomography: first experimental results , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[78]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[79]  Josh Star-Lack,et al.  Efficient scatter correction using asymmetric kernels , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[80]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[81]  M J Yaffe,et al.  X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[82]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[83]  R L Siddon,et al.  Calculation of the radiological depth. , 1985, Medical physics.

[84]  A. Ferrari,et al.  FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code , 2005 .

[85]  K Doi,et al.  Physical characteristics of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies. , 1985, Medical physics.

[86]  D. Bougié,et al.  Molybdenum , 1989, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[87]  K Doi,et al.  The validity of Monte Carlo simulation in studies of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[88]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[89]  L Peralta,et al.  Application of GEANT4 radiation transport toolkit to dose calculations in anthropomorphic phantoms. , 2004, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[90]  Joel E. Gray,et al.  Grids Improve Mammography Contrast , 2004 .

[91]  Ruola Ning,et al.  X-ray scatter correction algorithm for cone beam CT imaging. , 2004, Medical physics.

[92]  S. Incerti,et al.  Geant4 developments and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[93]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Summary of existing information on the incoherent scattering of photons, particularly on the validity of the use of the incoherent scattering function , 1997 .

[94]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Relativistic atomic form factors and photon coherent scattering cross sections , 1979 .

[95]  D R Dance,et al.  The computation of scatter in mammography by Monte Carlo methods. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[96]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[97]  Vadim Demchik,et al.  Pseudo-random number generators for Monte Carlo simulations on ATI Graphics Processing Units , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[98]  Spencer Gunn,et al.  Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[99]  S. Molloi,et al.  Photon counting computed tomography: concept and initial results. , 2005, Medical physics.

[100]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared. , 2012, Medical physics.

[101]  I A Brezovich,et al.  The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography. , 1978, Radiology.

[102]  Christin Wirth The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[103]  D R Dance,et al.  A Monte Carlo program for the calculation of contrast, noise and absorbed dose in diagnostic radiology. , 1994, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[104]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[105]  S.K. Ahn,et al.  A scatter correction using thickness iteration in dual-energy radiography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[106]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  A mathematical framework for including various sources of variability in a task-based assessment of digital breast tomosynthesis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[107]  Tao Wu,et al.  A new generation FFDM/tomosynthesis fusion system with selenium detector , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[108]  G. W. C. Kaye,et al.  Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants , 2018 .

[109]  Michaela C. C. Weigel,et al.  High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations , 2011, European Radiology.

[110]  D E Raeside,et al.  Monte Carlo principles and applications. , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[111]  Image resampling effects Image resampling effects in mammographic image simulation , 2011 .

[112]  G T Barnes,et al.  Contrast and scatter in x-ray imaging. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[113]  J. Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. , 2000, Medical physics.

[114]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[115]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. , 2013, Medical physics.

[116]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[117]  S. Donadio,et al.  Precision validation of Geant4 electromagnetic physics , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[118]  B. Mascialino,et al.  Implementation of a new Monte Carlo simulation tool for the development of a proton therapy beam line and verification of the related dose distributions , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[119]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[120]  Alaleh Rashidnasab,et al.  Realistic simulation of breast mass appearance using random walk , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[121]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Detectors for digital mammography. , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[122]  V. Beral,et al.  Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future , 2006, Journal of medical screening.

[123]  J. Star-Lack,et al.  Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[124]  Giuseppe A. P. Cirrone,et al.  Validation of the Geant4 electromagnetic photon cross-sections for elements and compounds , 2010 .

[125]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Review of photon interaction cross section data in the medical and biological context. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[126]  Andrew Karellas,et al.  Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer. , 2008, Medical physics.

[127]  J M Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation. , 2000, Medical physics.

[128]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[129]  Eduardo Guibelalde,et al.  Automatic scoring of CDMAM using a model of the recognition threshold of the human visual system: R* , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[130]  G Panayiotakis,et al.  MASTOS: Mammography Simulation Tool for design Optimization Studies. , 2000, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[131]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Digital mammography. , 2005, Radiology.

[132]  J A Seibert,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of the scattered radiation distribution in diagnostic radiology. , 1988, Medical physics.

[133]  G Panayiotakis,et al.  A multiple projection method for digital tomosynthesis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[134]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Implementation of pathologies in the Monte Carlo model in chest and breast imaging , 2003 .

[135]  K. Young Recent developments in digital mammography , 2006 .

[136]  K L Lam,et al.  Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio. , 1990, Medical physics.

[137]  John M Boone,et al.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data. , 2009, Medical physics.

[138]  P. Rodrigues,et al.  Overview of Geant4 applications in medical physics , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[139]  Constantine A Gatsonis,et al.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. , 2005, Radiology.

[140]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[141]  J A Seibert,et al.  X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution. , 1988, Medical physics.

[142]  J A Seibert,et al.  An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography. , 2000, Medical physics.

[143]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[144]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  A Modelling Framework for Evaluation of 2D-Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Systems , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[145]  S. C. Prasad,et al.  Scatter reduction in mammography with air gap. , 1996, Medical physics.

[146]  W. Nelson,et al.  The EGS Code System: Computer Programs for the Monte Carlo Simulation of Electromagnetic Cascade Showers (Version 3) , 1978 .

[147]  F. James A Review of Pseudorandom Number Generators , 1990 .

[148]  G. Knoll Radiation detection and measurement , 1979 .

[149]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Comparison of software and human observers in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[150]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections , 1975 .

[151]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[152]  Stephen J Glick,et al.  Breast CT. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[153]  Xinhua Li,et al.  Effects of scatter radiation on reconstructed images in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[154]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Validation of a Digital Mammography Image Simulation Chain with Automated Scoring of CDMAM Images , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[155]  C S Kwok,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[156]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[157]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Comparative evaluation of photon cross-section libraries for materials of interest in PET Monte Carlo simulations , 2000 .

[158]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Validation of a Simulated Dose Reduction Methodology Using Digital Mammography CDMAM Images and Mastectomy Images , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[159]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  A Survey of Patient Doses from Digital Mammography Systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009 , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[160]  Andrew D A Maidment,et al.  Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Medical physics.

[161]  F. Cerutti,et al.  The FLUKA code: Description and benchmarking , 2007 .

[162]  S. Molloi,et al.  Scatter correction in digital mammography based on image deconvolution , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[163]  A H Baydush,et al.  Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing. , 2000, Medical physics.

[164]  Guillaume Peter,et al.  Automated scoring of CDMAM: a dose study , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[165]  J. Boone,et al.  Evaluation of x-ray scatter properties in a dedicated cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2005, Medical physics.

[166]  Helmuth Vorherr,et al.  The Breast: Morphology, Physiology, and Lactation , 1974 .

[167]  Per Skaane,et al.  Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.

[168]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Automated scoring method for the CDMAM phantom , 2009, Medical Imaging.