Learning-enhanced adaptive DSS: a Design Science perspective

The process of acquiring, maintaining, updating, and using appropriate domain-specific knowledge has played an integral role in knowledge-based decision support systems. Although each of these stages is necessary and important, knowledge-based systems that operate in dynamic environments can become quickly stale when core knowledge embedded in these systems are not continually updated to reflect changes in the system over time. Clearly, stale knowledge could be faulty and cannot be relied upon for making decisions and a knowledge-based decision support system with stale knowledge may even be detrimental in the long run. We consider a generic adaptive DSS framework with learning capabilities that continually monitors itself for possible deficit in the knowledge-base, expired or stale knowledge already present in the knowledge-base, and availability of new knowledge from the environment. The knowledge-base is updated through incremental learning. We illustrate the generic knowledge-based adaptive DSS framework using examples from three different application areas. The framework is flexible in being able to be modified or extended to accommodate the idiosyncrasies of the application of interest. The framework considered is an example artifact that naturally satisfies the Design Science perspective.

[1]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research , 2008 .

[2]  Michael Jeng-Ping Shaw Knowledge-based scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems: an integration of pattern-directed inference and heuristic search , 1988 .

[3]  Maria Virvou,et al.  F-SMILE: An Intelligent Multi-Agent Learning Environment , 2004 .

[4]  Selwyn Piramuthu,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Knowledge-based framework for automated dynamic supply chain configuration , 2003 .

[5]  D. Wolpert,et al.  No Free Lunch Theorems for Search , 1995 .

[6]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[7]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  REPRESENTATIVE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS , 1981 .

[8]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Intelligent Scheduling with Machine Learning Capabilities: The Induction of Scheduling Knowledge§ , 1992 .

[12]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  A Learning-Enhanced Adaptive Decision Support System Framework , 2008 .

[13]  Selwyn Piramuthu Knowledge-based web-enabled agents and intelligent tutoring systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[14]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Decision support system for scheduling a Flexible Flow System: Incorporation of feature construction , 1998, Ann. Oper. Res..

[15]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[16]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  A framework for designing adaptive DSS interfaces , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[18]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Intelligent Systems And Active Dss , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Foundations of Decision Support Systems , 1981 .

[20]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .