Laughing at Risk: Sitcom Laugh Tracks Communicate Norms for Behavior

The role that sitcom laugh tracks play in the communication of social norms was investigated. Participants (n = 112) were exposed to a sitcom narrative in which reckless driving behaviors were exhibited, or a control narrative. One half of the participants viewed a clip with laugh track present, and the other half viewed a clip with the laugh track edited out. Results indicate that laugh tracks do communicate information about what kinds of driving behavior is normative in the target driving clip condition. Specifically, the accessibility of risky driving injunctive norms was influenced by the laugh track and scenario manipulation. This effect was moderated by identification with the character who exhibited reckless behavior. Accessibility of risky driving norms then predicted attitudes, descriptive norms, and behavioral intentions regarding risky driving. The implication of the results is that media narratives can communicate norms for behavior through the laugh track in a sitcom.

[1]  Marie-Louise Mares,et al.  Media Effects , 2013 .

[2]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  Na Na.  An Outline of Psychoanalysis , 1949, Mental Health.

[4]  Parul Jain,et al.  Identification With Characters and Discussion of Taboo Topics After Exposure to an Entertainment Narrative About Sexual Health , 2011 .

[5]  Christopher J Armitage,et al.  Augmenting the theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model: predictive validity of actor versus abstainer prototypes for adolescents' health-protective and health-risk intentions. , 2006, British journal of health psychology.

[6]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  David R. Ewoldsen,et al.  Attitude and Norm Accessibility and Cigarette Smoking , 2009 .

[8]  Nancy Rhodes,et al.  Age and gender differences in risky driving: the roles of positive affect and risk perception. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[10]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Stimulus Sampling and Social Psychological Experimentation , 1999 .

[11]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  An Explication of Social Norms , 2005 .

[12]  S. Fiske,et al.  Comprar Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology | Benjamin L. Miller | 9780470129111 | Wiley , 2009 .

[13]  Emily Moyer-Gusé,et al.  Entertainment-Education in the Context of Humor: Effects on Safer Sex Intentions and Risk Perceptions , 2011, Health communication.

[14]  M. Zanna,et al.  Not all automatic associations are created equal: How implicit normative evaluations are distinct from implicit attitudes and uniquely predict meaningful behavior , 2012 .

[15]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology , 2011 .

[16]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion , 2010 .

[17]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  How Behaviors are Influenced by Perceived Norms : A Test of the Theory of Normative Social Behavior , 2005 .

[18]  Jonathan Cohen.  Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters , 2001 .

[19]  R. Rimal.  Modeling the Relationship Between Descriptive Norms and Behaviors: A Test and Extension of the Theory of Normative Social Behavior (TNSB) , 2008, Health communication.

[20]  V. Rideout,et al.  Communicating health information through the entertainment media. , 2001, Health affairs.

[21]  R. Rimal,et al.  Friends Talk to Friends About Drinking: Exploring the Role of Peer Communication in the Theory of Normative Social Behavior , 2007, Health communication.

[22]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: social identity and group membership , 2000 .

[23]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[24]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[25]  M. Wanzer,et al.  An Explanation of the Relationship between Instructor Humor and Student Learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory , 2010 .

[26]  David R. Ewoldsen,et al.  The MODE Model and Its Implications for Studying the Media , 2015 .

[27]  D. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[28]  T. E. Ford,et al.  Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor: A Prejudiced Norm Theory , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[30]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment—Education , 2002 .

[31]  D. Giles.  Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research , 2002 .

[32]  Matthew M. Gervais,et al.  THE EVOLUTION AND FUNCTIONS OF LAUGHTER AND HUMOR: A SYNTHETIC APPROACH , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[33]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct , 1990 .

[34]  T. Dingus,et al.  The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[35]  Kristen Harrison,et al.  Understanding the Effectiveness of the Entertainment-Education Strategy: An Investigation of How Audience Involvement, Message Processing, and Message Design Influence Health Information Recall , 2013, Journal of health communication.

[36]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  Deconstructing Ally: Explaining Viewers' Interpretations of Popular Television , 2002 .

[37]  M. Slater,et al.  Entertainment—Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[38]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  Media and Risky Behaviors , 2008, The Future of children.

[39]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  Reaction time variability and intelligence: A “worst performance” analysis of individual differences , 1990 .

[40]  Amanda J. Swygart-Hobaugh.  Encyclopedia of Gender in Media, (Mary Kosut (Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012) , 2013 .

[41]  R. Rimal,et al.  What Is Normative in Health Communication Research on Norms? A Review and Recommendations for Future Scholarship , 2010, Health communication.

[42]  J. Igartua.  Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films , 2010 .

[43]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .