From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition

A usage-based view takes grammar to be the cognitive organization of one's experience with language. Aspects of that experience, for instance, the frequency of use of certain constructions or particular instances of constructions, have an impact on representation that is evidenced in speaker knowledge of conventionalized phrases and in language variation and change. It is shown that particular instances of constructions can acquire their own pragmatic, semantic, and phonological characteristics. In addition, it is argued that high-frequency instances of constructions undergo grammaticization processes (which produce further change), function as the central members of categories formed by constructions, and retain their old forms longer than lower-frequency instances under the pressure of newer formations. An exemplar model that accommodates both phonological and semantic representation is elaborated to describe the data considered.

[1]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[2]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[3]  Rens Bod,et al.  Beyond Grammar: An Experience-Based Theory of Language , 1998 .

[4]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Three Frequency Effects in Syntax , 1997 .

[5]  R. Nosofsky Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .

[6]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[7]  Joan L. Bybee Word Frequency in Lexical Diffusion and the Source of Morphophonological Change , 2007 .

[8]  B. Erman,et al.  The idiom principle and the open choice principle , 2000 .

[9]  Tsuyoshi Ono,et al.  The Pragmatic Nature of the So-Called Subject Marker Ga in Japanese: Evidence from Conversation , 2000 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[11]  E. Traugott Constructions in Grammaticalization , 2008 .

[12]  Lisa Green,et al.  African American English in the Diaspora , 2006 .

[13]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  A Usage-based Approach to Spanish Verbs of 'Becoming' , 2006 .

[14]  Merja Kytö,et al.  The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English , 1994 .

[15]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization , 2003 .

[16]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[17]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Chapter 4: A dynamic usage-based model , 1999 .

[18]  Mieko Ogura,et al.  The development of periphrastic do in English: a case of lexical diffusion in syntax , 1993 .

[19]  Sali A. Tagliamonte,et al.  The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English , 1999, Language Variation and Change.

[20]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Explanations for Language Universals , 1984 .

[21]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals , 1983 .

[22]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[23]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Does grammaticalization need reanalysis , 1998 .

[24]  William Pagliuca Perspectives on Grammaticalization , 1994 .

[25]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[26]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[27]  George A. Miller,et al.  Language and Communication , 1951 .

[28]  John W. Du Bois THE NEW PSYCHOLOGY OF LANGUAGE , 2003 .

[29]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[30]  Gunnel Tottie,et al.  Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: frequency as a determinant of linguistic conservatism in the development of negation in English , 1991 .

[31]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[32]  Shana Poplack,et al.  Variability, frequency, and productivity in the irrealis domain of French , 2001 .

[33]  Henning Andersen,et al.  On The Handbook of Historical Linguistics , 2005 .

[34]  Brian D. Joseph,et al.  The handbook of historical linguistics , 2003 .

[35]  Dieter Kastovsky Studies in early modern English , 1994 .

[36]  Joan L. Bybee Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[37]  K. Aaron Smith The role of frequency in the specialization of the English anterior , 2001 .

[38]  William D. Raymond,et al.  The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production 1 , 1999 .

[39]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[40]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  B. Heine,et al.  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework , 1991 .

[42]  Fernand Mossé,et al.  A handbook of Middle English , 1952 .

[43]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Joan L. Bybee Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[45]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[46]  D. Bolinger Syntactic Blends and Other Matters , 1961 .

[47]  David Bamman,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2006 .

[48]  T. Givón,et al.  On Understanding Grammar , 1979 .

[49]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[50]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[51]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[52]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation , 2001 .

[53]  J. Haiman,et al.  Iconicity in Syntax , 1987 .

[54]  D. Larsen-Freeman Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition , 1997 .

[55]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.

[56]  Joan L. Bybee Lexicalization of Sound Change and Alternating Environments , 2007 .

[57]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[58]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[59]  Ferdinand de Saussure Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .

[60]  Penelope Brown,et al.  The origins of syntax in discourse: A case study of Tok Pisin relatives [reprint of 1976 article in Language] , 1976 .

[61]  S. Chandler 3. Skousen’s analogical approach as an exemplar-based model of categorization , 2002 .

[62]  飯島 周 「会話の文法」に関する一考察 : Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written Englishの場合 , 1999 .

[63]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[64]  E. Traugott On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change , 1989 .

[65]  Joan L. Bybee The Emergent Lexicon , 2007 .

[66]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[67]  J. Hay Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? , 2001 .

[68]  J. Haiman Ritualization and the development of language , 1994 .

[69]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[70]  Andrew Wedel,et al.  Category competition drives contrast maintenance within an exemplar-based production/perception loop , 2004, SIGMORPHON@ACL.

[71]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[72]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Principles of diachronic syntax , 1979 .

[73]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English , 1999 .

[74]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.

[75]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency , 2008 .

[76]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[77]  Dieter Kastovsky,et al.  Historical English syntax , 1991 .

[78]  M. Banko,et al.  Analogical Modeling of Language , 1991, CL.

[79]  Joanne Scheibman,et al.  I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation , 2000 .

[80]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage , 2003 .

[81]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[82]  Joseph Wright,et al.  Old English Grammar , 1955 .