Fetal cerebellar growth and Sylvian fissure maturation: international standards from Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of INTERGROWTH‐21st Project

To construct international ultrasound‐based standards for fetal cerebellar growth and Sylvian fissure maturation.

[1]  M. Purwar,et al.  International standards for fetal brain structures based on serial ultrasound measurements from Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  D. Sahota,et al.  Transvaginal three‐dimensional ultrasound assessment of Sylvian fissures at 18–30 weeks' gestation , 2019, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  P. Chaemsaithong,et al.  Increased Sylvian fissure angle as early sonographic sign of malformation of cortical development , 2019, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  Jasmine L. Hect,et al.  Sex differences in functional connectivity during fetal brain development , 2019, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Purwar,et al.  Neurodevelopmental milestones and associated behaviours are similar among healthy children across diverse geographical locations , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Statistical methodology for constructing gestational age‐related charts using cross‐sectional and longitudinal data: The INTERGROWTH‐21st project as a case study , 2018, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2018, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  The satisfactory growth and development at 2 years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21st Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Jeroen Dudink,et al.  Impacts on prenatal development of the human cerebellum: a systematic review , 2017, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[10]  R. Napolitano,et al.  OP04.08: Charts of fetal brain structures a systematic review of methodological quality , 2017 .

[11]  K. Prashanth,et al.  Significance of Foetal Transcerebellar Diameter in Foetal Biometry: A Pilot Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[12]  E. Norwitz,et al.  Ultrasonographic Characteristics of Cortical Sulcus Development in the Human Fetus between 18 and 41 Weeks of Gestation , 2017, Chinese medical journal.

[13]  P. D. Nicola,et al.  International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Ultrasound‐based gestational‐age estimation in late pregnancy , 2016, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  J. Hirst,et al.  International standards for symphysis-fundal height based on serial measurements from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: prospective cohort study in eight countries , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[16]  Catherine Limperopoulos,et al.  Structure-function relationships in the developing cerebellum: Evidence from early-life cerebellar injury and neurodevelopmental disorders. , 2016, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[17]  J. Hirst,et al.  Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[18]  H. Masuyama,et al.  Creation of a cerebellar diameter reference standard and its clinical application to the detection of cerebellar hypoplasia unique to trisomy 18 , 2015, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Postnatal growth standards for preterm infants: the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Monitoring human growth and development: a continuum from the womb to the classroom. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  E. Montaguti,et al.  Sequential analysis of the normal fetal fissures with three‐dimensional ultrasound: a longitudinal study , 2015, Prenatal diagnosis.

[22]  L. Nardozza,et al.  Reference Range of Fetal Transverse Cerebellar Diameter Between 18 and 24 Weeks of Pregnancy in a Brazilian Population , 2015, Journal of child neurology.

[23]  C. Newton,et al.  The INTERGROWTH-21st Project Neurodevelopment Package: A Novel Method for the Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Neurodevelopment in Pre-School Age Children , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  D. Altman,et al.  International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown–rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  José Villar,et al.  International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project , 2014, The Lancet.

[26]  D. Altman,et al.  International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project , 2014, The Lancet.

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross-Sectional Study. , 2014, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[28]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews a Meta-analysis of Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure , 2022 .

[29]  D. G. Altman,et al.  Fetal biometry: how well can offline measurements from three‐dimensional volumes substitute real‐time two‐dimensional measurements? , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[30]  I. Sarris,et al.  Ultrasound methodology used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2013, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[31]  M. Purwar,et al.  The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2013, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[32]  A. Moron,et al.  Reference Ranges for Fetal Brain Fissure Development on 3‐Dimensional Sonography in the Multiplanar Mode , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[33]  Anqi Qiu,et al.  Population Differences in Brain Morphology and Microstructure among Chinese, Malay, and Indian Neonates , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  Intra‐ and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[35]  I. Sarris,et al.  A review of fetal volumetry: the need for standardization and definitions in measurement methodology , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[36]  C. Ioannou,et al.  Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[37]  Shilpi Jain,et al.  Transverse Cerebellar Diameter - A Marker for Estimation of Gestational Age , 2010 .

[38]  G. Azumendi,et al.  Depth of brain fissures in normal fetuses by prenatal ultrasound between 19 and 30 weeks of gestation , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[39]  L. D. de Vries,et al.  Grade and symmetry of normal fetal cortical development: a longitudinal two‐ and three‐dimensional ultrasound study , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[40]  B. Joshi.  Fetal transcerebellar diameter nomogram in Nepalese population , 2010, Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal.

[41]  Ana Monteagudo,et al.  Normal sonographic development of the central nervous system from the second trimester onwards using 2D, 3D and transvaginal sonography , 2009, Prenatal diagnosis.

[42]  Y. Ville,et al.  Assessment of fetal Sylvian fissure operculization between 22 and 32 weeks: a subjective approach , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[43]  A. Hofman,et al.  New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[44]  G. Pilu,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound examination of the fetal central nervous system , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[45]  Jimmy Espinoza,et al.  Objective Evaluation of Sylvian Fissure Development by Multiplanar 3‐Dimensional Ultrasonography , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[46]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’ , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[47]  D. Lev,et al.  Sonographic developmental milestones of the fetal cerebral cortex: a longitudinal study , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[48]  Mercedes Onis,et al.  Assessment of differences in linear growth among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study , 2006, Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement.

[49]  M. Onis.  WHO Motor Development Study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones , 2006, Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement.

[50]  A. Toi,et al.  How early are fetal cerebral sulci visible at prenatal ultrasound and what is the normal pattern of early fetal sulcal development? , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[51]  C. Ananth,et al.  Fetal transcerebellar diameter nomogram in singleton gestations with special emphasis in the third trimester: a comparison with previously published nomograms. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  Adem Kiris,et al.  Sonographic measurement of the fetal cerebellum, cisterna magna, and cavum septum pellucidum in normal fetuses in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy , 2003, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[53]  F. Chang,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of fetal cerebellar transverse and antero-posterior diameters. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[54]  Y. Jacquemyn,et al.  Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter in different ethnic groups , 2000, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[55]  J. Wladimiroff,et al.  Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[56]  F Barkhof,et al.  Normal gyration and sulcation in preterm and term neonates: appearance on MR images. , 1996, Radiology.

[57]  P. Royston,et al.  Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. , 1994 .

[58]  E. Reece,et al.  Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  C. Tzannatos,et al.  Prenatal measurement of the fetal cerebellum and cisterna cerebellomedullaris by ultrasound , 1986, Prenatal diagnosis.

[60]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[61]  R. D. McLeary,et al.  Ultrasonography of the fetal cerebellum. , 1984, Radiology.

[62]  R. Martorell,et al.  Height and weight standards for preschool children. How relevant are ethnic differences in growth potential? , 1974, Lancet.

[63]  C. Garel,et al.  Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[64]  D. Altman,et al.  A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. , 1990, Computers in biology and medicine.

[65]  T. Hata,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal transverse cerebellum in utero. , 1989, Gynecologic and obstetric investigation.