HandCARE: A Cable-Actuated Rehabilitation System to Train Hand Function After Stroke

We have developed a robotic interface to train hand and finger function. HandCARE is a Cable-actuated rehabilitation system, in which each finger is attached to an instrumented cable loop allowing force control and a predominantly linear displacement. The device, whose designed is based on biomechanical measurements, can assist the subject in opening and closing movements and can be adapted to accommodate various hand shapes and finger sizes. Main features of the interface include a differential sensing system, and a clutch system which allows independent movement of the five fingers with only one actuator. The device is safe, easily transportable, and offers multiple training possibilities. This paper presents the biomechanical measurements carried out to determine the requirements for a finger rehabilitation device, and the design and characterization of the complete system.

[1]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS FOR THE DESIGN OF FORCE-REFLECTING HAPTIC INTERFACES , 1994 .

[2]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Recent Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  The Rutgers Master II-new design force-feedback glove , 2002 .

[4]  Peter Crome,et al.  Hand function and stroke , 2002 .

[5]  M. Schieber,et al.  Differential impairment of individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  W. Rymer,et al.  Relative contributions of neural mechanisms versus muscle mechanics in promoting finger extension deficits following stroke , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  Makoto Sato,et al.  Development of new force feedback interface for two-handed 6DOF manipulation SPIDAR-G&G system , 2003, ICAT.

[8]  Michael Recce,et al.  A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke: transfer to function , 2004, EMBC 2004.

[9]  Marc H Schieber,et al.  Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  H. Kawsaki,et al.  Hand rehabilitation support system based on self-motion-control , 2004, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. TExCRA Technical Exhibition Based..

[12]  S.C. Cramer,et al.  A robotic device for hand motor therapy after stroke , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[13]  T. Maeder,et al.  Millinewton force sensor based on low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) technology , 2005, Research in Microelectronics and Electronics, 2005 PhD.

[14]  Giancarlo Corradini,et al.  Design and characterisation of low-cost thick-film piezoresistive force sensors for the 100 mN to 100 N range , 2005 .

[15]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin - robot for rehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[16]  M. Munih,et al.  HIFE-haptic interface for finger exercise , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  R. Gassert,et al.  MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[18]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A Haptic Knob for Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A 2-DOF fMRI compatible haptic interface to investigate the neural control of arm movements , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[24]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A 2-DOF fMRI Compatible Haptic Interface to Interact with Arm Movements , 2006 .

[25]  R. Gassert,et al.  Development of a Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Therapy to train Hand Function for Activities of Daily Living , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[26]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Attachment Methods for a Multifinger Haptic Device , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[27]  R. Gassert,et al.  A Cable Driven Robotic System to Train Finger Function After Stroke , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[28]  Chee Leong Teo,et al.  A Haptic Knob for Rehabilitation of Hand Function , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  R.C.V. Loureiro,et al.  Reach & Grasp Therapy: Design and Control of a 9-DOF Robotic Neuro-rehabilitation System , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[30]  H. Kawasaki,et al.  Development of a Hand Motion Assist Robot for Rehabilitation Therapy by Patient Self-Motion Control , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[31]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Design, Characterization, and Impedance Limits of a Hand Robot , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[32]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.