An assessment of the iPad as a testing platform for distance visual acuity in adults

Objectives Visual acuity is a common measurement in general practice, and the advent of new technology such as tablet computers offers a change in the way in which these tests are delivered. The aim of this study was to assess whether measurements of distance visual acuity using LogMAR letter charts displayed on an iPad tablet computer were in agreement with standard clinical tests of visual acuity in adults with normal vision. Design Blinded, diagnostic test study. Setting Single centre (University) in Auckland, New Zealand. Participants University staff and students (n=85). Participants were required to have visual acuity better than 6/60 and wear habitual refractive correction during testing. Participants were excluded if there was any history of ocular pathology. Primary and secondary outcome measures Visual acuity measured under a number of conditions. Results The iPad tablet with its glossy screen was highly susceptible to glare resulting in acuity measurements that were significantly poorer (approximately 2 LogMAR lines) than those made using an ETDRS chart and a standard computerised testing system (n=56). However, fitting the iPad with an antiglare screen and positioning the device away from sources creating reflected (veiling) glare resulted in acuity measurements that were equivalent those made using gold standard charts (n=29). Conclusions Tablet computers are an attractive option for visual acuity measurement due to portability, the ability to randomise letters, automated scoring of acuity and the ability to select from a range of charts. However, these devices are only suitable for use in situations where sources of glare can be eliminated.

[1]  A Arditi,et al.  On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Z Currie,et al.  Reliability of Snellen charts for testing visual acuity for driving: prospective study and postal questionnaire , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  S. Cousens,et al.  Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  D Whitaker,et al.  Reliability of the Snellen chart , 1995, BMJ.

[5]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Eric Berger,et al.  The iPad: gadget or medical godsend? , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  R. Bourne,et al.  Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys , 2003, Eye.

[8]  Zhao-Tian Zhang,et al.  A Pilot Trial of the Ipad Tablet Computer as a Portable Device for Visual Acuity Testing , 2013, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  Many referral letters omit visual acuity measurement , 1995, BMJ.

[10]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  B. Hawkins,et al.  Measurement and analysis of visual acuity in multicenter randomized clinical trials in the United States: Findings from a survey , 2003, Ophthalmic epidemiology.