On the effects of triangulated terrain resolution on distributed hydrologic model response

Distributed hydrologic models based on triangulated irregular networks (TIN) provide a means for computational efficiency in small to large‐scale watershed modelling through an adaptive, multiple resolution representation of complex basin topography. Despite previous research with TIN‐based hydrology models, the effect of triangulated terrain resolution on basin hydrologic response has received surprisingly little attention. Evaluating the impact of adaptive gridding on hydrologic response is important for determining the level of detail required in a terrain model. In this study, we address the spatial sensitivity of the TIN‐based Real‐time Integrated Basin Simulator (tRIBS) in order to assess the variability in the basin‐averaged and distributed hydrologic response (water balance, runoff mechanisms, surface saturation, groundwater dynamics) with respect to changes in topographic resolution. Prior to hydrologic simulations, we describe the generation of TIN models that effectively capture topographic and hydrographic variability from grid digital elevation models. In addition, we discuss the sampling methods and performance metrics utilized in the spatial aggregation of triangulated terrain models. For a 64 km2 catchment in northeastern Oklahoma, we conduct a multiple resolution validation experiment by utilizing the tRIBS model over a wide range of spatial aggregation levels. Hydrologic performance is assessed as a function of the terrain resolution, with the variability in basin response attributed to variations in the coupled surface–subsurface dynamics. In particular, resolving the near‐stream, variable source area is found to be a key determinant of model behaviour as it controls the dynamic saturation pattern and its effect on rainfall partitioning. A relationship between the hydrologic sensitivity to resolution and the spatial aggregation of terrain attributes is presented as an effective means for selecting the model resolution. Finally, the study highlights the important effects of terrain resolution on distributed hydrologic model response and provides insight into the multiple resolution calibration and validation of TIN‐based hydrology models. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[2]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[3]  K. Beven,et al.  Similarity and scale in catchment storm response , 1990 .

[4]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Kinematic routing using finite elements on a triangular irregular network , 1991 .

[5]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[6]  Jay Lee,et al.  Comparison of existing methods for building triangular irregular network, models of terrain from grid digital elevation models , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Baltasar Cuevas-Renaud,et al.  SHIFT: a distributed runoff model using irregular triangular facets , 1992 .

[8]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  DEM aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling , 1993 .

[9]  Victor J. D. Tsai,et al.  Delaunay Triangulations in TIN Creation: An Overview and a Linear-Time Algorithm , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Ling Bian,et al.  Response of a distributed watershed erosion model to variations in input data aggregation levels , 1993 .

[11]  Y. Tachikawa,et al.  Development of a Basin Geomorphic Information System Using a TIN-DEM Data Structure , 1992 .

[12]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain , 1994 .

[13]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[14]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[15]  Mark P. Kumler.  An Intensive Comparison of Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) , 1994 .

[16]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes , 1994 .

[17]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[18]  Luis Garrote,et al.  A distributed model for real-time flood forecasting using digital elevation models , 1995 .

[19]  K. Beven,et al.  Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data. , 1995 .

[20]  J. Feyen,et al.  Calibration, Validation and Sensitivity Analysis of the MIKE-SHE Model Using the Neuenkirchen Catchment as Case Study , 1997 .

[21]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  A TEST OF TOPMODEL'S ABILITY TO PREDICT SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED GROUNDWATER LEVELS , 1997 .

[22]  J. Refsgaard.  Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[23]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Hydrological modeling of continental-scale basins , 1997 .

[24]  Keith Beven,et al.  Analytical compensation between DTM grid resolution and effective values of staurated hydraulic conductivity within the TOPMODEL framework , 1997 .

[25]  Mark de Berg,et al.  On levels of detail in terrains , 1995, SCG '95.

[26]  James Brasington,et al.  Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for TOPMODEL , 1998 .

[27]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology , 1999 .

[28]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Effect of grid size on runoff and soil moisture for a variable‐source‐area hydrology model , 1999 .

[29]  E. Nelson,et al.  Adaptive Tessellation Method for Creating TINs from GIS Data , 1999 .

[30]  P. Julien,et al.  Grid-Size Effects on Surface Runoff Modeling , 2000 .

[31]  Caterina Valeo,et al.  Grid-resolution effects on a model for integrating urban and rural areas. , 2000 .

[32]  T. Farr,et al.  Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data , 2000 .

[33]  A. Musy,et al.  Digital terrain analysis of the Haute-Mentue catchment an scale effect for hydrological modelling with TOPMODEL , 2000 .

[34]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Differences in topographic characteristics computed from 100- and 1000-m resolution digital elevation model data , 2000 .

[35]  Filippo Catani,et al.  Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data , 2001 .

[36]  P. Bates,et al.  Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow , 2001 .

[37]  Nicole M. Gasparini,et al.  An object-oriented framework for distributed hydrologic and geomorphic modeling using triangulated irregular networks , 2001 .

[38]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Influence of spatial resolution on simulated streamflow in a macroscale hydrologic model , 2002 .

[39]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE‐SHE code , 2002 .

[40]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[41]  Russell S. Harmon,et al.  Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D , 2002 .

[42]  T. Schmugge,et al.  Remote sensing in hydrology , 2002 .

[43]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Optimal use of high‐resolution topographic data in flood inundation models , 2003 .

[44]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: a fully-distributed physically-based approach , 2004 .

[45]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Generation of triangulated irregular networks based on hydrological similarity , 2004 .

[46]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Embedding landscape processes into triangulated terrain models , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..