On connection control and traffic optimisation in FMC networks

With the introduction of smartphones and tablets and the dramatical increase of the data traffic on the cellular network, operators are seeking for new solutions to provide the users with continuous connectivity while preserving a good quality of service. Since most of current user terminals are equipped with multiple interfaces, one solution is to take advantage of the different access networks. However, with the current network architectures and user application, it is not possible to use both accesses at the same time or even to switch from one to another without loosing current sessions. In this paper, we present and analyse the main mechanisms of the literature that allow a user to use multiple access networks at the same time or to move between the different networks. We show how a converged network can permit the deployment of new solutions and present some of them accompanied by use cases.

[1]  Margaret Cullen,et al.  GRE Notifications for Hybrid Access , 2015 .

[2]  Dino Farinacci,et al.  LISP Mobile Node , 2016 .

[3]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  HAIR: hierarchical architecture for internet routing , 2009, ReArch '09.

[4]  Hesham Soliman,et al.  Dual-Stack Mobile IPv4 , 2009, RFC.

[5]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Multi-source multipath HTTP (mHTTP): a proposal , 2013, SIGMETRICS '14.

[6]  Amine Dhraief,et al.  Toward Mobility and Multihoming Unification- The SHIM6 Protocol: A Case Study , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[7]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[8]  Xavier Lagrange,et al.  Very tight coupling between LTE and Wi-Fi for advanced offloading procedures , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW).

[9]  Dino Farinacci,et al.  The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) , 2009, RFC.

[10]  Michael Menth,et al.  Global Locator, Local Locator, and Identifier Split (GLI-Split) , 2013, Future Internet.

[11]  Pekka Nikander,et al.  Host Identity Protocol , 2005 .

[12]  Christoph Paasch,et al.  Improving Multipath TCP , 2014 .

[13]  Mark Handley,et al.  TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses , 2020, RFC.

[14]  Marc Lelarge,et al.  The 2014 ACM international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems , 2014, SIGMETRICS 2014.

[15]  Dino Farinacci,et al.  Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) , 2000, RFC.

[16]  Annie Gravey,et al.  A Survey of Available Features for Mobile Traffic Offload , 2014 .

[17]  Raj Jain,et al.  MILSA: A Mobility and Multihoming Supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture for Naming in the Next Generation Internet , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[18]  Christian Vogt Six/one router: a scalable and backwards compatible solution for provider-independent addressing , 2008, MobiArch '08.

[19]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[20]  Marcelo Bagnulo,et al.  The Shim6 architecture for IPv6 multihoming , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[21]  Raj Jain,et al.  MILSA: A New Evolutionary Architecture for Scalability, Mobility, and Multihoming in the Future Internet , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[22]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[23]  Masahiro Kozuka,et al.  Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration , 2007, RFC.

[24]  Thomas Dreibholz,et al.  Stream control transmission protocol: Past, current, and future standardization activities , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[25]  Jari Arkko,et al.  A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[26]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Stream Control Transmission Protocol , 2000, RFC.

[27]  Djamshid Tavangarian,et al.  Survey on Mobility and Multihoming in Future Internet , 2014, Wirel. Pers. Commun..