The Effectiveness of Leading Grammar/Style Software Packages in Analyzing Business Students' Writing

This study compares the effectiveness of five leading grammar/style analysis software packages in analyzing business students' writing. The software exhibited considerable differences in the following areas: correctly identifying various mechanical and style errors, avoiding annoying and misleading false error messages, and providing helpful remedial advice. No prior research study has empirically compared grammar/style analysis software along all these important dimensions. PowerEdit was found to be the overall superior package, demonsrating proficiency in detecting errors in punctuation, sentence structure, passive voice, and weak wording. The results have significant implications for utilizing grammar/style analysis software to improve students' writing.

[1]  Kenneth R. Mayer.  The Role of Style Analyzers in Business Communication , 1991 .

[2]  Martha H. Rader,et al.  A Survey of Communication Practices of Business School Graduates by Job Category and Undergraduate Major , 1980 .

[3]  E. L. Miller,et al.  An Executive Appraisal of Courses Which Best Prepare One for General Management , 1982 .

[4]  Larry Press,et al.  Personal computing , 1990 .

[5]  Allen J. Wedell,et al.  Computer Assisted Writing Instruction: Is It Effective? , 1991 .

[6]  Judith Bogert,et al.  Improving the Quality of Writing in the Workplace , 1989 .

[7]  Debbie A. Renshaw.  The Effect of an Interactive Grammar/Style Checker on Students' Writing Skills. , 1991 .

[8]  Grace E. Rich,et al.  CAI vs. Textbook for Grammar and Punctuation Skills. , 1993 .

[9]  Luett Hanson.  Literature and Software Review: Computer-Aided Remediation for Grammar, Punctuation , 1989 .

[10]  Robert G. Insley.  Integrating Style Analysis Software Into the Basic Business Communication Course , 1989 .

[11]  Laura A. Brady,et al.  A Contextual Theory for Business Writing , 1993 .

[12]  Karen S. Sterkel,et al.  Textual Analysis with Computers to Improve the Writing Skills of Business Communications Students , 1986 .

[13]  Randy Smye,et al.  Style and usage software: Mentor not judge , 1988 .

[14]  Gail E. Hawisher.  The Effects of Word Processing on the Revision Strategies of College Freshmen , 1987 .

[15]  Marie E. Flatley,et al.  The Impact of Microcomputers on ABC With Recommendations for Teaching, Writing, and Research , 1987 .

[16]  Rick Fischer,et al.  Grammar Checkers: Programs That May Not Enhance Learning , 1992 .

[17]  John C. Bean.  Computerized Word-Processing as an Aid to Revision. , 1983 .

[18]  Gloria Pearlstein.  Performance without training: How to improve your writing by using an automated grammar/style checker , 1992 .

[19]  William J. Scheibal,et al.  An Assessment of Computerized Text Editing Programs , 1991 .

[20]  Beverly Davenport Sypher,et al.  Communication-Related Abilities and Upward Mobility: A Longitudinal Investigation. , 1986 .