The influence of symbolic literacy on memory: testing Plato's hypothesis.

The present study examined the influence of the production of external symbols on memory strategies. Plato hypothesized that dependency on writing as an external memory store would be deterimental to memory. Three experiments were conducted to explore this hypothesis. Participants played Concentration, a memory game where players must find matching pairs of cards placed face down in an array. Participants were allowed to make notes to aid their performance under some experimental conditions, while under other conditions they could not. In Experiments 1 and 2, the unexpected removal of participants' notes revealed that the performance benefit was due to notes acting as a form of external memory storage, rather than as an aid to encoding information in memory. Experiment 3 qualified these findings by demonstrating that the identity of each card was retained in memory, while the location of each card tended to be stored in the participants' external notations. These data suggest a modified interpretation of Plato's hypothesis in that symbolic literacy may change how we remember information. Rather than storing all information in memory, we only have to retain the information necessary to use the much larger storage capacity of the external system. Thus, the introduction of external symbols allows for a change in how memory is adaptively distributed.

[1]  F. di Vesta,et al.  Listening and note taking. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  M. Cole,et al.  The psychology of literacy , 1983 .

[3]  D. Olson,et al.  Towards a psychology of literacy: on the relations between speech and writing , 1996, Cognition.

[4]  A. Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  The development of cognitive constraints on notations , 1996 .

[5]  A. Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  NOTATIONAL ADAPTATION IN CHILDREN , 1998 .

[6]  W. Ong,et al.  Orality and literacy : the technologizing of the word , 1982 .

[7]  I. Illich.  A plea for research on lay literacy , 1987 .

[8]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[9]  Edwin Hutchins.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995 .

[10]  E. Havelock,et al.  Preface to Plato , 1962 .

[11]  Marshall McLuhan.  The Gutenberg Galaxy , 1962 .

[12]  R. Haber,et al.  Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli , 1970 .

[13]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[14]  M. Donald.  Human cognitive evolution: what we were, what we are becoming , 1993 .

[15]  Roy Harris,et al.  The Origin of Writing , 1986 .

[16]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[17]  Jack Goody,et al.  Literacy in Traditional Societies. , 1970, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[18]  Kenneth A. Kiewra.  Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative , 1985 .

[19]  M. J. Intons-Peterson,et al.  External and internal memory aids: When and how often do we use them? , 1986 .

[20]  M. Naka,et al.  The effect of repeated writing on memory , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[21]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[22]  Maurice Bloch,et al.  The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture , 1991 .

[23]  Kenneth A. Kiewra.  A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond , 1989 .

[24]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Chapter 6 – The Development of External Symbol Systems: The Child as a Notator , 1996 .

[25]  Margaret H. Thomas,et al.  The positive effects of writing practice on integration of foreign words in memory. , 1987 .

[26]  D. Olson,et al.  Literacy and Orality , 1991 .

[27]  J. Goody,et al.  The Consequences of Literacy , 1963, Comparative Studies in Society and History.