The Role of Price Information in Agricultural Markets: Experimental Evidence from Rural Peru

This paper presents new experimental evidence on the role of price information in agricultural markets. For this purpose, I set up a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) in the central highlands of Peru. A group of farmers in randomly selected villages got access to detailed price information for the most relevant local crops in six regional markets through cell phone SMS. The information was delivered throughout the four-month period immediately after harvest, where they sell most of their production. I find that the beneficiaries got higher sales prices for their products, compared to households in the control group. The effect is robust to different specifications. I also find that this effect was mostly driven by increases in the prices for relatively more perishable crops, for which information could be more valuable. Additionally, information made farmers more likely to sell their production (extensive margin). Albeit not statistically significant, the estimate for sales on the intensive margin are positive and quite large. Finally, I also investigate the possibility of information spillovers by examining marketing outcomes of households who did not receive the information but lived in villages where others did. I do not find any significant effects among households in this group.

[1]  Ghazala Mansuri,et al.  Together We Will: Experimental Evidence on Female Voting Behavior in Pakistan , 2011 .

[2]  R. Jensen The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector , 2007 .

[3]  M. Torero,et al.  Access to Telephone Services and Household Income in Poor Rural Areas Using a Quasi-Natural Experiment for Peru , 2008 .

[4]  Chetan Dave,et al.  Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? , 2008 .

[5]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  A. Goyal World Bank From the SelectedWorks of Aparajita Goyal July , 2010 Information , Direct Access to Farmers , and Rural Market Performance in Central India , 2017 .

[7]  M. Fafchamps,et al.  How Does Mobile Phone Coverage Affect Farm-Gate Prices? Evidence from West Africa , 2011 .

[8]  Bart Minten,et al.  Impact of SMS-Based Agricultural Information on Indian Farmers , 2012 .

[9]  Timothy G. Conley,et al.  Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana , 2010 .

[10]  Anne Case,et al.  Modeling Technology Adoption in Developing Countries , 1993 .

[11]  Thomas W. L. Norman,et al.  PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE , 2006 .

[12]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[13]  M. Fafchamps,et al.  Price Transmission and Trader Entry in Domestic Commodity Markets , 2008, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[14]  Diether W. Beuermann Information and Communications Technology, Agricultural Profitability and Child Labor in Rural Peru , 2015 .

[15]  Ragan Petrie,et al.  On the Preferences of Principals and Agents , 2007 .

[16]  E. Oster,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION: PEER EFFECTS IN MENSTRUAL CUP TAKE-UP , 2012 .

[17]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Forecasting Risk Attitudes: An Experimental Study Using Actual and Forecast Gamble Choices , 2008 .

[18]  Ragan Petrie,et al.  Rationality and the Nature of the Market , 2008 .

[19]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Neighborhood Peer Effects in Secondary School Enrollment Decisions , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  T. Yamano,et al.  The Impact of Mobile Phone Coverage Expansion on Market Participation: Panel Data Evidence from Uganda , 2009 .

[21]  Leveling with Friends: Social Networks and Indian Farmers’ Demand for Agricultural Custom Hire Services , 2013 .

[22]  Kaivan Munshi Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution , 2004 .

[23]  T. Molony Running out of credit: the limitations of mobile telephony in a Tanzanian agricultural marketing system* , 2008 .

[24]  G. Stigler The Economics of Information , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[26]  J. Aker Information from Markets Near and Far: Mobile Phones and Agricultural Markets in Niger , 2010 .

[27]  Craig McIntosh,et al.  Tracking the Introduction of the Village Phone Product in Rwanda , 2009 .

[28]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Long-Term Educational Consequences of Secondary School Vouchers: Evidence from Administrative Records in Colombia , 2006 .

[29]  Jakob Svensson,et al.  GETTING PRICES RIGHT: THE IMPACT OF THE MARKET INFORMATION SERVICE IN UGANDA , 2009 .

[30]  Imran Rasul,et al.  Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique , 2002 .

[31]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Asymmetric Information and Middleman Margins: An Experiment with West Bengal Potato Farmers , 2013 .

[32]  P. Courtois,et al.  Farmer Bargaining Power and Market Information Services , 2015 .