To frack or not to frack: Perceptions of the risks and opportunities of high-volume hydraulic fracturing in the United States

Abstract Although proponents praise natural gas as a clean and abundant energy source, the varying impacts and uncertainties surrounding the process of extracting natural gas from unconventional sources, known as horizontal high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) or “fracking,” have raised important concerns. This project explores public perceptions of the risks and beneficial opportunities associated with HVHF as recognized by the residents of two counties in Michigan, USA, one that currently produces natural gas by HVHF and one that does not. Through an analysis of media content related to HVHF in each case study site and interviews with stakeholders in both counties, this comparative study contributes to understanding the similarities in differences in perceptions of risks and opportunities in communities differently impacted by unconventional natural gas development, offering theoretical insight into the shared concerns and divergent perspectives among publics that have different experiences with HVHF, insight that provides new understandings of factors shaping community perceptions and means of improving environmental policy and water governance.

[1]  C. Davis,et al.  Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking , 2012 .

[2]  K. Bakker,et al.  Introduction to the Themed Section : Water Governance and the Politics of Scale , 2012 .

[3]  A. Leiserowitz.  Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[4]  Sheila M. Olmstead,et al.  Risks and risk governance in unconventional shale gas development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[7]  Benjamin Sovacool.  Cornucopia or Curse? Reviewing the Costs and Benefits of Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking) , 2014 .

[8]  Simona L. Perry.  Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Addressing the Societal Costs of Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration and Production: A Framework for Evaluating Short-Term, Future, and Cumulative Risks and Uncertainties of Hydrofracking , 2012 .

[9]  Frank Spellman,et al.  Chemicals Used in Hydraulic Fracturing , 2012 .

[10]  Anthony E. Ladd.  Stakeholder Perceptions of Socioenvironmental Impacts from Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the Haynesville Shale , 2013 .

[11]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[12]  D. Dzombak,et al.  Water Management Challenges Associated with the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing , 2011 .

[13]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[14]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[15]  Susan J Riha,et al.  Wastewater management and Marcellus Shale gas development: trends, drivers, and planning implications. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  L. Lebel,et al.  The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region , 2005 .

[17]  R. Thomas,et al.  The Energy-Water Nexus: potential groundwater-quality degradation associated with production of shale gas , 2013 .

[18]  A. Poole,et al.  Framing fracking: private property, common resources, and regimes of governance , 2014 .

[19]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  “Fracking” Controversy and Communication: Using National Survey Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2014 .

[20]  A. Ernstoff,et al.  Clearing the Waters of the Fracking Debate , 2013 .

[21]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Examining the feasibility of converting New York State's all-purpose energy infrastructure to one using wind, water, and sunlight , 2013 .

[22]  Brooklynn J. Anderson,et al.  Local Leaders’ Perceptions of Energy Development in the Barnett Shale , 2009 .

[23]  J. Abad,et al.  Water resource impacts during unconventional shale gas development: The Pennsylvania experience , 2014 .

[24]  D. Shaw,et al.  Managing Conflict In Facility Siting: an international comparison , 2005 .

[25]  L. Glenna,et al.  The Relationship between Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Pennsylvania and Local Perceptions of Risk and Opportunity , 2013 .

[26]  P. Stern,et al.  Public and stakeholder participation for managing and reducing the risks of shale gas development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Jeffrey Jacquet,et al.  Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance , 2002 .

[29]  Michael S. Carolan,et al.  The Precautionary Principle and Traditional Risk Assessment , 2007 .

[30]  Susanne Rippl.  Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement , 2002 .

[31]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Not in Our Backyards: The Grassroots Environmental Movement , 2014 .

[32]  Timothy W. Kelsey,et al.  RESIDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM DEVELOPMENT OF NATURAL GAS IN THE MARCELLUS SHALE: A COMPARISON OF PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK CASES * , 2011 .

[33]  Anthony A Leiserowitz,et al.  American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  W. Freudenburg,et al.  Weapons of mass distraction: Magicianship, misdirection, and the dark side of legitimation , 2007 .

[35]  Gene L. Theodori,et al.  Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development. , 2009 .

[36]  B. Johnson,et al.  Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters , 2011 .

[37]  Bernard D Goldstein,et al.  Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  N. Freudenberg,et al.  Not in our backyards: The grassroots environmental movement , 1991 .

[39]  D. Chavis,et al.  Sense of community: A definition and theory , 1986 .

[40]  L. Glenna,et al.  Local Impacts of Unconventional Gas Development within Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale Region: Gauging Boomtown Development through the Perspectives of Educational Administrators , 2014 .

[41]  William J. Brady,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation in the United States: The Laissez-Faire Approach of the Federal Government and Varying State Regulations , 2012 .

[42]  Johannes Schwank,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing in the State of Michigan - Technology Technical Report , 2013 .