Touching Materials Visually: About the Dominance of Vision in Building Material Assessment

Designers’ visual way of knowing and working tends to be highly valued in design research. In architecture such an approach is increasingly criticized. Since people experience buildings with all their senses, architects’ visual focus is said to the run the risk of disregarding non-visual aspects. This study focuses on the visual and tactile assessment of building materials. Analyses show that architecture students assess several experiential qualities differently by touch than by vision. Vision dominates the overall assessment, yet does not always anticipate touch correctly. Moreover architecture students seem to be unaware of how common building materials feel, and are unable to identify them by touch only. This identifies the need for a more elaborate consideration of non-visual aspects during design in general and design education in particular.

[1]  J. Albers,et al.  Interaction of Color , 1971 .

[2]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[3]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[4]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[6]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[8]  M. Gulak.  Architectural guidelines for state psychiatric hospitals. , 1991, Hospital & community psychiatry.

[9]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic identification of objects and their depictions , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Tracy B. Henley,et al.  Cognitive and affective components of stimuli presented in three modes , 1993 .

[11]  Edward K. Sadalla,et al.  Symbolism in Building Materials , 1993 .

[12]  B. Lawson.  Design in mind , 1994 .

[13]  P. Valdez,et al.  Effects of color on emotions. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  THE SOCIALIZATION OF ARCHITECTURAL PREFERENCE , 1996 .

[15]  S J Lederman,et al.  Cognitive Salience of Haptic Object Properties: Role of Modality-Encoding Bias , 1996, Perception.

[16]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Karen Franck,et al.  Architecture from the Inside Out: From the Body, the Senses, the Site and the Community , 2000 .

[18]  Nancy J. Stone,et al.  Designing effective study environments. , 2001 .

[19]  J. Stevens,et al.  Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th ed. , 2002 .

[20]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design , 2002 .

[21]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[22]  J. Xin,et al.  Investigation of human's emotional responses on colors , 2006 .

[23]  H. Schifferstein.  The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Patrick Devlieger,et al.  Blindness and the multi-sensorial city , 2006 .

[25]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[26]  N. Camgoz,et al.  Colour and lighting in hospital design , 2006 .

[27]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Materials in products selection: Tools for including user-interaction in materials selection , 2007 .

[28]  Ine Wouters,et al.  KNOWLEDGE FOR DESIGN – THE ARCHITECT ’ S VOCABULARY , 2007 .

[29]  P. Desmet,et al.  The effects of sensory impairments on product experience and personal well-being , 2007, Ergonomics.

[30]  Kemal Yildirim,et al.  Effects of indoor color on mood and cognitive performance , 2007 .

[31]  S. Holl,et al.  Questions Of Perception: Phenomenology Of Architecture , 2007 .

[32]  P. Hekkert,et al.  Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes , 2009 .

[33]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Design Expertise as Disability , 2009 .

[34]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Architects and Visually Impaired People , 2009 .

[35]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Designing spaces for every listener , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[36]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[37]  Elvin Karana,et al.  A tool for meaning driven materials selection , 2010 .

[38]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  EXTENDING THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN DESIGN(ERS) AND DISABLED USE(RS): FROM CONVERSATION TO EMBODIED SKILL , 2010 .

[39]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Studying the Unthinkable Designer: Designing in the Absence of Sight , 2010, DCC.

[40]  Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein,et al.  Multi sensory design , 2011, DESIRE.

[41]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Relating material experience to technical parameters: A case study on visual and tactile warmth perception of indoor wall materials , 2012 .

[42]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Haptic design research: A blind sense of space , 2012 .

[43]  Ine Wouters,et al.  Architects’ considerations while selecting materials , 2012 .