User Involvement in Design: The Four Models

User studies and user involvement in design have been heavily discussed but lacks a systematic theory, thus causing confusion for novice designers and researchers. Through extensive literature review, this paper identifies three approaches of user studies, i.e. ‘empirical studies’ which tends to ‘learn from the past’; ‘experimental studies’ which tends to ‘learn from the present’, and ‘scenario-based studies’ which tends to ‘focus on the future’. It also summarises four models of user involvement in design, i.e. designers representing users, designers consulting users, users participating in the design process, and users as designers. These syntheses will help designers and researchers understand user involvement in a more structured manner, thus making the application of the theory and practice easier.

[1]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Extending Lead User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness , 2007 .

[2]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  User-technology relationships: Some Recent Developments , 2007 .

[3]  RANIA SIATRI,et al.  The Evolution of User Studies , 1999 .

[4]  E. Jaakkola,et al.  The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation , 2014 .

[5]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal principles of design : 100 ways to enhance usability,influence perception, increase appeal, make better, designdecisions, and teach through design , 2003 .

[6]  Jan H. Schumann,et al.  Service Locus of Control and Customer Coproduction , 2012 .

[7]  N. Franke,et al.  Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market , 2004 .

[8]  Simeon Keates,et al.  BS 7000-6:2005Design management systems. Managing inclusive design. Guide , 2005 .

[9]  Peter P.C.C. Verbeek,et al.  Expanding Mediation Theory , 2012 .

[10]  Peter Gregor,et al.  User-Sensitive Inclusive Design , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .

[12]  Simone Taffe The hybrid designer/end-user: Revealing paradoxes in co-design , 2015 .

[13]  Arun Kumar Tripathi Postphenomenological investigations of technological experience , 2014, AI & SOCIETY.

[14]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  User toolkits for innovation , 2001 .

[15]  Bin Zhang,et al.  User-Mobile Phone Interactions: A Postphenomenology Analysis , 2013, HCI.

[16]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[17]  Philip A.E. Brey,et al.  Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn , 2010 .

[18]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions , 2009 .

[19]  Joy Goodman-Deane,et al.  A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Peter P.C.C. Verbeek,et al.  Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations , 2008 .

[21]  L. Jeppesen User Toolkits for Innovation: Consumers Support Each Other , 2005 .

[22]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Applying user centred and participatory design approaches to commercial product development , 2014 .

[23]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[24]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  Multistability and the Agency of Mundane Artifacts: from Speed Bumps to Subway Benches , 2014 .

[25]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[26]  M. Ponty Phenomenology of perception , 2016 .

[27]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Participatory design in community informatics , 2007 .

[28]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  From user-centered to participatory design approaches , 2002 .

[29]  Hua Dong,et al.  Critical User Forums for Inclusive Design , 2007 .

[30]  Hua Dong,et al.  Design for Inclusivity: A Practical Guide to Accessible, Innovative and User-Centred Design , 2007 .

[31]  Erling Björgvinsson,et al.  Open-ended participatory design as prototypical practice , 2008 .

[32]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Design for Services , 2011 .

[33]  Christina Raasch,et al.  Embedded lead users—The benefits of employing users for corporate innovation , 2015 .

[34]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Research Note: User Design of Customized Products , 2007 .

[35]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  “Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects” , 2009 .

[36]  Zu’bi M. F. Al-Zu’bi,et al.  Suppliers versus Lead Users: Examining Their Relative Impact on Product Variety , 2012 .

[37]  Thomas Erl,et al.  SOA Principles of Service Design , 2007 .

[38]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Reducing Medical Costs and Improving Quality via Self-Management Tools , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[39]  D. Mahr,et al.  The Value of Customer Co-Created Knowledge during the Innovation Process , 2013 .

[40]  Yoni Van Den Eede,et al.  In Between Us: On the Transparency and Opacity of Technological Mediation , 2011 .

[41]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[42]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[43]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2001) 247–257 PERSPECTIVE: User toolkits for innovation , 2022 .

[44]  A. Renda,et al.  Innovation law and policy in the European Union , 2012 .

[45]  S. Ogawa,et al.  User-Generated Versus Designer-Generated Products: A Performance Assessment at Muji , 2012 .

[46]  M. Nørskov Revisiting Ihde’s Fourfold “Technological Relationships”: Application and Modification , 2015 .

[47]  P. Keinz,et al.  Synergies among Producer Firms, Lead Users, and User Communities: The Case of the LEGO Producer–User Ecosystem† , 2014 .

[48]  Gülay Hasdoǧan,et al.  The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs , 1996 .

[49]  C. Bühler Design for All - from Idea to Practise , 2008, ICCHP.

[50]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Bruce Mau,et al.  Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive , 2011 .

[52]  Karin Bendixen,et al.  Design for All in Scandinavia - a strong concept. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[53]  B. Menguc,et al.  Customer and Supplier Involvement in Design: The Moderating Role of Incremental and Radical Innovation Capability , 2014 .

[54]  Seung Ki Moon,et al.  REPRESENTING USER ACTIVITY AND PRODUCT FUNCTION FOR UNIVERSAL DESIGN , 2009 .

[55]  Konstantin Wellner User Innovators in the Silver Market , 2015 .

[56]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Disrupting digital library development with scenario informed design , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[57]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  How does inclusive design relate to good design? Designing as a deliberative enterprise , 2013 .

[58]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .

[59]  Francesc Aragall,et al.  Universal Design: The HUMBLES Method for User-Centred Business , 2012 .

[60]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  USER DESIGN OF CUSTOMIZED PRODUCTS , 2007 .

[61]  Hua Dong,et al.  Designing with Information and Empathy: Delivering Human Information to Designers , 2011 .

[62]  S. Dopson,et al.  When Does Search Openness Really Matter? A Contingency Study of Health‐Care Innovation Projects , 2013 .

[63]  Roberto M. Saco,et al.  Service Design: An Appraisal , 2010 .