The Impact of Variable Selection Coverage on Detection of Ligands from a DNA-Encoded Library Screen

DNA-encoded library (DEL) technology has become a prominent screening platform in drug discovery owing to the capacity to screen billions or trillions of compounds in a single experiment. Although numerous successes with DEL technology have been reported, we are unaware of a rigorous examination of the many different variables that can influence a screen’s success. Herein, we explore the impact of variable sample sequencing depth on the detection of tool compounds with known affinities toward a given target while simultaneously probing the effect of initial compound input. Our sequencing data confirm reports that high-affinity compounds can be discovered directly from a DEL screen, but we demonstrate that a mismatch between selection output and sequencing quantity can obscure useful ligands. Our results highlight the importance of selection coverage in grasping the entire picture of a DEL screen where the signal of a weak or underrepresented ligand may be suppressed by the inherent noise of a selection. These potential missed ligands may be critical to the success or failure of a drug discovery program.

[1]  Gang Yao,et al.  Prioritizing multiple therapeutic targets in parallel using automated DNA-encoded library screening , 2017, Nature Communications.

[2]  A. Heger,et al.  UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy , 2016, bioRxiv.

[3]  A. Sannino,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Affinity Selection Performance by Using DNA‐Encoded Chemical Libraries , 2019, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[4]  Christoph E. Dumelin,et al.  High-throughput sequencing allows the identification of binding molecules isolated from DNA-encoded chemical libraries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Michael A. Stravs,et al.  Automated screening for small organic ligands using DNA-encoded chemical libraries , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[6]  Diana Gikunju,et al.  Discovery of a Potent BTK Inhibitor with a Novel Binding Mode by Using Parallel Selections with a DNA‐Encoded Chemical Library , 2017, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[7]  Anthony D. Keefe,et al.  DNA-encoded chemistry: enabling the deeper sampling of chemical space , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  Baoguang Zhao,et al.  Design, synthesis and selection of DNA-encoded small-molecule libraries. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[9]  David R. Liu,et al.  Small-Molecule Discovery from DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries , 2012 .

[10]  Thomas Kodadek,et al.  Chemical composition of DNA-encoded libraries, past present and future. , 2019, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[11]  O. J. Dunn Multiple Comparisons among Means , 1961 .

[12]  Lukas Leder,et al.  Encoded Library Technologies as Integrated Lead Finding Platforms for Drug Discovery , 2019, Molecules.

[13]  Michelle C. Schaeffer,et al.  Discovery of a First-in-Class Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (RIP1) Kinase Specific Clinical Candidate (GSK2982772) for the Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Letian Kuai,et al.  Randomness in DNA Encoded Library Selection Data Can Be Modeled for More Reliable Enrichment Calculation , 2018, SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D.

[15]  A. Satz DNA Encoded Library Selections and Insights Provided by Computational Simulations. , 2015, ACS chemical biology.

[16]  Gabriele Bassi,et al.  DNA‐encoded chemical libraries – achievements and remaining challenges , 2018, FEBS letters.

[17]  E. Trinquet,et al.  HTRF: A Technology Tailored for Drug Discovery –A Review of Theoretical Aspects and Recent Applications , 2009, Current chemical genomics.

[18]  Yizhou Li,et al.  Future challenges with DNA-encoded chemical libraries in the drug discovery domain , 2019, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[19]  Natalia Milosevich,et al.  Robustness of In Vitro Selection Assays of DNA-Encoded Peptidomimetic Ligands to CBX7 and CBX8 , 2018, SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D.

[20]  Ryan T. Strachan,et al.  Allosteric “beta-blocker” isolated from a DNA-encoded small molecule library , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Lerner,et al.  Encoded combinatorial chemistry. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Satz Simulated Screens of DNA Encoded Libraries: The Potential Influence of Chemical Synthesis Fidelity on Interpretation of Structure-Activity Relationships. , 2016, ACS combinatorial science.

[23]  Joseph C. Hogan,et al.  Combinatorial chemistry in drug discovery , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Martin M Matzuk,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Enrichment from DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Selections , 2019, ACS combinatorial science.

[25]  Yun Ding,et al.  Discovering Drugs with DNA‐Encoded Library Technology: From Concept to Clinic with an Inhibitor of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase , 2017, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.