Evaluating the Effect of Proximity to Hog Farms on Residential Property Values: A GIS-Based Hedonic Price Model Approach

Abstract: The decline of small-scale farms and the dramatic increase in the size of corporate animal operations in recent years has sparked controversy over the impacts of confined animal feeding operations on surrounding residential communities. This study examines the applicability of geographic information systems (GIS)- based hedonic price modeling for evaluating impacts to residential property values from feeding operations, particularly hog operations. Residential property attributes were derived and compiled in a GIS. These attributes were used to construct a hedonic model to examine the relationship between distance to hog farms and property sales prices. Results indicate a negative and significant impact on property value from hog operations. A comparison of the results from this study with those of several other GIS-based hedonic models indicates that GIS-based hedonic price modeling is a promising method for assessing property value damages associated with animal operations, for evaluating potential impacts when siting new operations, and for developing setback guidelines. Introduction The corporatization of livestock production during the 1990s has led to rapid growth of large-scale confined-animal feeding operations (CAFOs), especially in the pork industry. The result has been a decrease in the total number of hog farms in the United States and a tremendous increase in the size of individual operations. This trend has sparked a controversy about the relative benefits and costs of large-scale industrial hog farms. A major concern for local communities is the impact of nearby CAFOs on surrounding residents. These impacts might include offensive odors (Swine Odor Task Force 1995; Chapin et al. 1998; Tyndall and Colletti 2000), physical and mental health problems (Schiffman et al. 1995; Thu et al. 1997; Wing and Wolf 1999), and degraded water quality (Hallberg et al. 1992; Hallberg 1996; Jackson 1996). The costs of such negative impacts on surrounding communities are not reflected in market prices for pork. One possible approach to account for externalities associated with CAFOs is through evaluation of property values of residential parcels surrounding the operations. In this paper we describe the use of GIS techniques to derive additional parcel attribute data for constructing a hedonic price model of the impact of proximity to hog farms on residential property values. We include a brief discussion of model construction and potential applications. A more detailed discussion of the econometric techniques and analysis can be found in Ansine (2000). Hedonic Price Models The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of proximity to swine facilities on the selling price of residential properties. Previous studies have used the hedonic pricing method (HPM) to approach the impact of CAFOs on property values (Abeles-Allison and Connor 1990; Taff et al. 1996; Palmquist et al. 1997; Mubarak et al. 1999; Bruton 2001; Herriges et al. 2003). A hedonic model attempts to explain the selling price of a house in terms of its physical attributes and its surrounding environment. If successful, it can reveal whether an environmental characteristic (such as proximity to a CAFO) has a significant effect on price, and how much the house's value is affected by a marginal increase or decrease in this environmental attribute. The hedonic price model can be expressed as P = f (C, E) (1) where P is the selling price of the house, C is a set of physical attributes that contribute to the price of a house (e.g., number of bedrooms, square footage, lot size), and E is a set of environmental attributes that can include factors that surround or define the house's physical location, such as its proximity to schools, parks, shopping, and livestock farms (Goodman 1978). Hedonic price models are commonly estimated by the method of ordinary least squares (OLS). …

[1]  S. Wing,et al.  Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  S. Schiffman,et al.  The effect of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents , 1995, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  M. D. Shipman,et al.  The limitations of social research , 1972 .

[4]  P. Bruun Sea-Level Rise as a Cause of Shore Erosion , 1962 .

[5]  Norbert Haala,et al.  Data fusion for the detection and reconstruction of buildings , 1995 .

[6]  Reiko Habe Public design control in American communities: design guidelines/design review , 1989 .

[7]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Visualizing the City: Communicating Urban Design to Planners and Decision-Makers , 2001 .

[8]  F. Roka,et al.  Hog Operations, Environmental Effects, and Residential Property Values , 1997 .

[9]  Michael Barry,et al.  Informal Settlement Characteristics in a Rural Land Restitution Case: Elandskloof, South Africa , 2000 .

[10]  G. Parsons,et al.  Measuring the Cost of Beach Retreat , 2001 .

[11]  Diana Fuguitt,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis for Public Sector Decision Makers , 1999 .

[12]  Tom Heath,et al.  What is a Skyline: A Quantitative Approach , 1994 .

[13]  George R Hallberg,et al.  Soil and Water Quality: Issues for the Farm Bill , 1995 .

[14]  Tom Heath,et al.  Tall Buildings and the Urban Skyline , 2000 .

[15]  Jonathan Barnett,et al.  An introduction to urban design , 1982 .

[16]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[17]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  A survey of aesthetic controls in English speaking countries , 1988 .

[18]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  MEASURED EFFECTS OF FEEDLOTS ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES IN MINNESOTA: A REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE , 1996 .

[19]  Heinz Rüther,et al.  Application of snakes and dynamic programming optimisation technique in modeling of buildings in informal settlement areas , 2002 .

[20]  GIS-based Visual Perception Analysis of Urban Natural Landscape for Urban Planning Supporting: A Case Study of Jinzishan Hill Region , 2001 .

[21]  Richard C. Ready,et al.  GIS Analysis of Land Use on the Rural-Urban Fringe: The Impact of Land Use and Potential Local Disamenities on Residential Property Values and on the Location of Residential Development in Berks County, Pennsylvania , 2003 .

[22]  Mark Burnett,et al.  The art of tracking , 2003 .

[23]  G. Hallberg The Iowa state-wide rural well-water survey : site and well characteristics and water quality , 1992 .

[24]  E. Baltsavias,et al.  3-D Building Reconstruction with ARUBA: A Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation , 1997 .

[25]  L. Connor,et al.  An Analysis of Local Benefits and Costs of Michigan Hog Operations Experiencing Environmental Conflicts , 1990 .

[26]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Linking Modelling and Visualisation for Natural Resources Management , 1997 .

[27]  S. Reynolds,et al.  A Control Study of the Physical and Mental Health of Residents Living Near a Large-scale Swine Operation , 1997 .

[28]  John Delafons Aesthetic Control: A Report on Methods Used in the USA to Control the Design of Buildings , 1990 .

[29]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Detecting buildings in aerial images , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[30]  Lani Roux,et al.  Using video imagery in land tenure information systems : A study of a communal property association in the Village of Algeria, South Africa , 2001 .

[31]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Public Preferences for High Rise Buildings: Stylistic and Demographic Effects , 1991 .

[32]  M. Barry,et al.  Evaluating cadastral systems in periods of uncertainty : a study of Cape Town's Xhosa-speaking communities. , 1999 .

[33]  Orrin H. Pilkey,et al.  The Use of Mathematical Models to Predict Beach Behavior for U.S. Coastal Engineering: A Critical Review , 2000 .

[34]  Theodosios Pavlidis,et al.  Use of Shadows for Extracting Buildings in Aerial Images , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[35]  Catherine Farvacque-Vitkovic The Future Of African Cities: Challenges And Priorities For Urban Development , 1998 .

[36]  John W. McManus,et al.  Reefs at Risk , 1998 .

[37]  G. Czapar,et al.  [Water quality]. , 1992, Verhandelingen - Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van Belgie.

[38]  J. Herriges,et al.  Living with Hogs in Iowa: The Impact of Livestock Facilities on Rural Residential Property Values , 2003, Land Economics.

[39]  A. Goodman Hedonic prices, price indices and housing markets , 1978 .

[40]  J. Tyndall,et al.  Air Quality and Shelterbelts: Odor Mitigation and Livestock Production a Literature Review , 2000 .