The Experimental Unit in Statistical Analysis

healthy skepticism toward their own work, because the validity of any statistical analysis for any experiment depends upon how nearly the data and components of the experiment approximate the conditions of the mathematical model employed. The mathematical statistician is largely concerned with the development of &dquo;theoretical&dquo; experiments; the researcher employs models developed by the theoretician to assist him in making an objective and, hopefully, correct interpretation. Some situations closely parallel the models but other situations are only rough approximations, at best. The &dquo;success&dquo; of gambling casinos in Las Vegas rests on the premise that the assumptions of their mathematical models are almost perfectly met. Conversely, the probability-calculated assuming fair dice-of 15 straight &dquo;passes&dquo; is irrelevant in a crap game with loaded dice. Perfect isomorphism between models and reality is rarely possible in the behavioral sciences, yet the accuracy of our conclusions and inferences is contingent, at least in part, upon the degree of correspondence between the model and the experimental processes and data. A researcher needs

[1]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[2]  H. Faigel Mentally Retarded Children , 1968, Clinical pediatrics.

[3]  Lillie Dl The effects of motor development lessons on mentally retarded children. , 1968 .

[4]  H. Fletcher Possible interpretive problems in analyses using group means as the experimental unit. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. Kershner,et al.  Doman-Delacato's Theory of Neurological Organization Applied with Retarded Children , 1968, Exceptional children.

[6]  D. Lillie The effects of motor development lessons on mentally retarded children. , 1968, American journal of mental deficiency.

[7]  F. Lord A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Quinn McNemar,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. , 1967 .

[9]  William F. Massy,et al.  Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1964 .

[10]  W. Hays Statistics for psychologists , 1963 .

[11]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  The Essentials of Educational Statistics. , 1956 .

[12]  E. Brunswik Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.

[13]  I NICOLETTI,et al.  The Planning of Experiments , 1936, Rivista di clinica pediatrica.

[14]  E. F. Lindquist,et al.  Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education , 1953 .

[15]  H. Hartley,et al.  The maximum F-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. , 1950, Biometrika.

[16]  W. G. Cochran The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total , 1941 .