Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive

CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive (CGD) promises to be a highly adaptable approach for spreading genetically engineered alleles throughout a species, even if those alleles impair reproductive success. CGD has been shown to be effective in laboratory crosses of insects, yet it remains unclear to what extent potential resistance mechanisms will affect the dynamics of this process in large natural populations. Here we develop a comprehensive population genetic framework for modeling CGD dynamics, which incorporates potential resistance mechanisms as well as random genetic drift. Using this framework, we calculate the probability that resistance against CGD evolves from standing genetic variation, de novo mutation of wild-type alleles, or cleavage repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)—a likely by-product of CGD itself. We show that resistance to standard CGD approaches should evolve almost inevitably in most natural populations, unless repair of CGD-induced cleavage via NHEJ can be effectively suppressed, or resistance costs are on par with those of the driver. The key factor determining the probability that resistance evolves is the overall rate at which resistance alleles arise at the population level by mutation or NHEJ. By contrast, the conversion efficiency of the driver, its fitness cost, and its introduction frequency have only minor impact. Our results shed light on strategies that could facilitate the engineering of drivers with lower resistance potential, and motivate the possibility to embrace resistance as a possible mechanism for controlling a CGD approach. This study highlights the need for careful modeling of the population dynamics of CGD prior to the actual release of a driver construct into the wild.

[1]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of CRISPR gene drives , 2016, Science Advances.

[2]  M. Wade,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 gene drives in genetically variable and non-randomly mating wild populations , 2016, bioRxiv.

[3]  P. Gendron,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-Derived Mutations Both Inhibit HIV-1 Replication and Accelerate Viral Escape. , 2016, Cell reports.

[4]  J. Bull Lethal gene drive selects inbreeding , 2016, bioRxiv.

[5]  Jackson Champer,et al.  Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Andrea Crisanti,et al.  A CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drive System Targeting Female Reproduction in the Malaria Mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Ethan Bier,et al.  Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Xiao-Hui Zhang,et al.  Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering , 2015, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[9]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Z. Strezoska,et al.  Systematic analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 mismatch tolerance reveals low levels of off-target activity. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[11]  George M. Church,et al.  Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory , 2015, Science.

[12]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Modeling the Manipulation of Natural Populations by the Mutagenic Chain Reaction , 2015, Genetics.

[13]  S. Ritchie,et al.  Assessing the epidemiological effect of wolbachia for dengue control. , 2015, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[14]  Ethan Bier,et al.  The mutagenic chain reaction: A method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations , 2015, Science.

[15]  P. Keightley,et al.  Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Heliconius melpomene , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  Andrea Crisanti,et al.  A CRISPR-Cas 9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae , 2015 .

[17]  John M. Marshall,et al.  Novel synthetic Medea selfish genetic elements drive population replacement in Drosophila; a theoretical exploration of Medea-dependent population suppression. , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[18]  J. P. Collins,et al.  Regulating gene drives , 2014, Science.

[19]  Robert L. Unckless,et al.  The Population Genetics of Evolutionary Rescue , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[20]  George M Church,et al.  Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations , 2014, bioRxiv.

[21]  Austin Burt,et al.  Heritable strategies for controlling insect vectors of disease , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  F. Reed,et al.  First Steps towards Underdominant Genetic Transformation of Insect Populations , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Soft Selective Sweeps in Complex Demographic Scenarios , 2014, Genetics.

[24]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Daniel R. Schrider,et al.  Rates and Genomic Consequences of Spontaneous Mutational Events in Drosophila melanogaster , 2013, Genetics.

[26]  A. Burt,et al.  Modelling the spatial spread of a homing endonuclease gene in a mosquito population , 2013, The Journal of applied ecology.

[27]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  John M. Marshall,et al.  A Synthetic Gene Drive System for Local, Reversible Modification and Suppression of Insect Populations , 2013, Current Biology.

[29]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[30]  Alan R. Davidson,et al.  Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system , 2012, Nature.

[31]  P. Andolfatto,et al.  Revisiting an Old Riddle: What Determines Genetic Diversity Levels within Species? , 2012, PLoS biology.

[32]  Austin Burt,et al.  Requirements for effective malaria control with homing endonuclease genes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  J. Hermisson,et al.  On the Fixation Process of a Beneficial Mutation in a Variable Environment , 2011, Genetics.

[34]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Using underdominance to bi-stably transform local populations. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  M. Daly,et al.  Common Genetic Variants and Modification of Penetrance of BRCA2-Associated Breast Cancer , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[36]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Evidence that Adaptation in Drosophila Is Not Limited by Mutation at Single Sites , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[37]  Marian Thomson,et al.  Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. , 2009, Genome research.

[38]  A. Burt,et al.  The Population Genetics of Using Homing Endonuclease Genes in Vector and Pest Management , 2008, Genetics.

[39]  Robert L. Unckless,et al.  Population Extinction and the Genetics of Adaptation , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Fred Gould,et al.  Broadening the Application of Evolutionarily Based Genetic Pest Management , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  Lorian Schaeffer,et al.  A Synthetic Maternal-Effect Selfish Genetic Element Drives Population Replacement in Drosophila , 2007, Science.

[42]  Lorian Schaeffer,et al.  A synthetic maternal-effect selfish genetic element drives population replacement in Drosophila. , 2007, Science.

[43]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila , 2007, Nature.

[44]  S. Sinkins,et al.  Gene drive systems for insect disease vectors , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  Austin Burt,et al.  Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  Population cycles : the case for trophic interactions , 2002 .

[47]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. , 2001, Genetics.

[48]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. , 1997, Genetics.

[49]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[50]  G. G. Foster,et al.  Chromosome rearrangements for the control of insect pests. , 1972, Science.

[51]  C. F. CURTIS,et al.  Possible Use of Translocations to fix Desirable Genes in Insect Pest Populations , 1968, Nature.

[52]  M. Kimura,et al.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. , 1962, Genetics.