The Intrinsic Electrophysiological Characteristics of Fly Lobula Plate Tangential Cells: III. Visual Response Properties

In this last paper in a series (Borst and Haag, 1996; Haag et al., 1997) about the lobula plate tangential cells of the fly visual system (CH, HS, and VS cells), the visual response properties were examined using intracellular recordings and computer simulations. In response to visual motion stimuli, all cells responded mainly by a graded shift of their axonal membrane potential. While ipsilateral motion resulted in a graded membrane potential shift, contralateral motion led to distinct EPSPs. For HS cells, simultaneous extracellular recorded action potentials of a spiking interneuron, presumably the H2 cell, corresponded to the EPSPs in the HS cell in a one-to-one fashion. When HS cells were hyperpolarized during ipsilateral motion, they mainly produced action potentials, but when they were hyperpolarized during contralateral motion only a slight increase of EPSP amplitude, could be observed. Intracellular application of the sodium channel blocker QX 314 abolished action potentials of HS cells while having little effect on the graded membrane response to ipsilateral motion. HS and CH cells were also studied with respect to their spatial integration properties. For both cell types, their graded membrane response was found to increase less than linearly with the size of the ipsilateral motion pattern. However, while for HS cells various amounts of hyperpolarizing current injected during motion stimulation led to different saturation levels, this was not the case for CH cells. In response to a sinusoidal velocity modulation, CH cells followed pattern motion only up to 10 Hz modulation frequency, but HS cells still revealed significant membrane depolarizations up to about 40 Hz.In the computer simulations, the compartmental models of tangential cells, as derived in the previous papers, were linked to an array of local motion detectors. The model cells revealed the same basic response features as their natural counterparts. They showed a response saturation as a function of stimulus size. In CH-models, however, the saturation was less pronounced than in real CH-cells, indicating spatially nonuniform membrane resistances with higher values in the dendrite. As in the experiments, HS models responded to high-frequency velocity modulation with a higher amplitude than did CH models.

[1]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  In vivo imaging of calcium accumulation in fly interneurons as elicited by visual motion stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  N. Franceschini,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  L. F. Abbott 4 – Single Neuron Dynamics: an Introduction , 1994 .

[4]  Alexander Borst,et al.  The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells: I. Passive membrane properties , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[5]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Principles of visual motion detection , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity and Gain Control in Visual Interneurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  On-off units in the first optic chiasm of the blowfly II. Spatial properties , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  A. Borst,et al.  Encoding of Visual Motion Information and Reliability in Spiking and Graded Potential Neurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Varjú,et al.  Localization and Orientation in Biology and Engineering , 1984, Proceedings in Life Sciences.

[10]  B. Connors,et al.  Effects of local anesthetic QX-314 on the membrane properties of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. , 1982, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  R. Hengstenberg Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Fast temporal adaptation of on-off units in the first optic chiasm of the blowfly , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  A. Borst How do nerve cells compute fly visual interneurones , 1996 .

[14]  Cole Gilbert,et al.  Membrane Conductance Changes Associated with the Response of Motion Sensitive Insect Visual Neurons , 1990, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences.

[15]  G. Geiger,et al.  Visual orientation behaviour of flies after selective laser beam ablation of interneurones , 1981, Nature.

[16]  R. R. Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  K. Hausen Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[18]  C. Wehrhahn,et al.  Neural circuits mediating visual flight control in flies. II. Separation of two control systems by microsurgical brain lesions , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Wolf,et al.  Optomotor-blindH31—aDrosophila mutant of the lobula plate giant neurons , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[20]  P. Schwindt,et al.  Properties of persistent sodium conductance and calcium conductance of layer V neurons from cat sensorimotor cortex in vitro. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[22]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration and its role in computing image velocity. , 1998, Science.

[23]  J. Miller,et al.  Information theoretic analysis of dynamical encoding by four identified primary sensory interneurons in the cricket cercal system. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[25]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration of motion information in visual interneurons of the blowfly , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  C. Clifford,et al.  Psychophysics of motion adaptation parallels insect electrophysiology , 1996, Current Biology.

[27]  Frédéric E. Theunissen,et al.  NeMoSys: A System for Realistic Single Neuron Modeling , 1994 .

[28]  D W Arnett,et al.  Spatial and temporal integration properties of units in first optic ganglion of dipterans. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Roland Hengstenberg,et al.  Roll-Stabilization During Flight of the Blowfly’s Head and Body by Mechanical and Visual Cues , 1984 .

[30]  Charles J. Wilson,et al.  The origins of two-state spontaneous membrane potential fluctuations of neostriatal spiny neurons , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  K. Hausen The Lobula-Complex of the Fly: Structure, Function and Significance in Visual Behaviour , 1984 .

[32]  Hendrik Eckert,et al.  The centrifugal horizontal cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly, Phaenicia sericata , 1983 .

[33]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  J. Bower,et al.  Exploring parameter space in detailed single neuron models: simulations of the mitral and granule cells of the olfactory bulb. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Calcium accumulation in visual interneurons of the fly: stimulus dependence and relationship to membrane potential. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  W. Rall Cable theory for dendritic neurons , 1989 .

[37]  K. Kirschfeld The visual system of Musca: Studies on optics, structure and function , 1972 .

[38]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Synapse distribution on VCH, an inhibitory, motion‐sensitive interneuron in the fly visual system , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  G. Geiger,et al.  Visual processing of moving single objects and wide-field patterns in flies: Behavioural analysis after laser-surgical removal of interneurons , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  C. Wehrhahn,et al.  Microsurgical lesion of horizontal cells changes optomotor yaw responses in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[42]  J. Hablitz,et al.  EPSPs in rat neocortical neurons in vitro. II. Involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the generation of EPSPs. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[44]  J. Miller,et al.  Effects of adaptation on neural coding by primary sensory interneurons in the cricket cercal system. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  A. Borst,et al.  Active Membrane Properties and Signal Encoding in Graded Potential Neurons , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Mechanisms of dendritic integration underlying gain control in fly motion-sensitive interneurons , 1995, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[47]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of R1-6 and R 7 and 8 , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[48]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  An adaptive Reichardt detector model of motion adaptation in insects and mammals , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[49]  A Borst How do nerve cells compute? Dendritic integration in fly visual interneurones. , 1996, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[50]  A. Borst,et al.  Cholinergic and GABAergic receptors on fly tangential cells and their role in visual motion detection. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Amplification of high-frequency synaptic inputs by active dendritic membrane processes , 1996, Nature.

[52]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Temporal modulation of luminance adapts time constant of fly movement detectors , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[53]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[54]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[55]  K. Hausen,et al.  The synaptic organization of visual interneurons in the lobula complex of flies , 1980, Cell and Tissue Research.

[56]  J. M. Zanker,et al.  Visual detection of paradoxical motion in flies , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[57]  A. Borst,et al.  Direction selectivity of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons is computed in a two-stage process. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.