Single cells can sense their position in a morphogen gradient.

Xenopus blastula cells show a morphogen-like response to activin by expressing different genes according to the concentration of activin to which they are exposed. To understand how cells recognize their position in a concentration gradient, it is essential to know whether each cell responds individually to activin concentration. An alternative idea, proposed by previous work, is that cells need to interact with their neighbours to generate a concentration-related response. To distinguish between these ideas, we have cultured blastula cells under conditions which provide different degrees of contact with other cells, allowing nil to maximum communication with their neighbours. The cultures include cells attached to fibronectin and cells resting unattached on an agarose base. The cultures also include cells that have no contact with any cell except their clonal progeny, cells that have lateral contact to neighbouring cells, and cells that are completely enveloped by other cells in a reaggregate. We have used RNase protection and in situ hybridization to assay the expression of the activin-responsive Xenopus genes Xbra, Xgsc, Xeomes, Xapod, Xchordin, Mix1, Xlim1 and Cerberus. We find no difference in gene expression between cells attached to fibronectin and those unattached on agarose. Most importantly, we find that cells respond to activin in a concentration-related way irrespective of their degree of contact with other cells. Therefore interaction among cells is not required for the interpretation of morphogen concentration, at least in the case of the early genes studied here. We conclude that isolated blastula cells can sense and respond individually to activin by expressing genes in a concentration-dependent way.

[1]  Douglas A. Melton,et al.  Mesodermal patterning by an inducer gradient depends on secondary cell–cell communication , 1994, Current Biology.

[2]  J. Smith,et al.  Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate , 1990, Nature.

[3]  Ken W. Y. Cho,et al.  Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid , 1991, Cell.

[4]  W. Gelbart,et al.  Signaling through both type I DPP receptors is required for anterior-posterior patterning of the entire Drosophila wing. , 1997, Development.

[5]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Activin signalling and response to a morphogen gradient , 1994, Nature.

[6]  C. Hudson,et al.  Xsox17α and -β Mediate Endoderm Formation in Xenopus , 1997, Cell.

[7]  J. Gurdon.  Methods for nuclear transplantation in amphibia. , 1977, Methods in cell biology.

[8]  M. L. King,et al.  Xenopus VegT RNA is localized to the vegetal cortex during oogenesis and encodes a novel T-box transcription factor involved in mesodermal patterning. , 1996, Development.

[9]  Steven Dyson,et al.  The Interpretation of Position in a Morphogen Gradient as Revealed by Occupancy of Activin Receptors , 1998, Cell.

[10]  J C Smith,et al.  Mesoderm‐inducing factors in early vertebrate development. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[11]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Activin has direct long-range signalling activity and can form a concentration gradient by diffusion , 1997, Current Biology.

[12]  C. Niehrs,et al.  Patterns and control of cell motility in the Xenopus gastrula. , 1998, Development.

[13]  J. Smith,et al.  Mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis: responding cells must be in contact for mesoderm formation but suppression of epidermal differentiation can occur in single cells. , 1988, Development.

[14]  C. Hudson,et al.  Xsox17alpha and -beta mediate endoderm formation in Xenopus. , 1997, Cell.

[15]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Eomesodermin, a Key Early Gene in Xenopus Mesoderm Differentiation , 1996, Cell.

[16]  L. Wolpert.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  M. Horb,et al.  A vegetally localized T-box transcription factor in Xenopus eggs specifies mesoderm and endoderm and is essential for embryonic mesoderm formation. , 1997, Development.

[18]  J. Gurdon,et al.  A community effect in muscle development , 1993, Current Biology.

[19]  J. E. Howard,et al.  Analysis of gastrulation: different types of gastrulation movement are induced by different mesoderm-inducing factors in Xenopus laevis , 1993, Mechanisms of Development.

[20]  J. Smith,et al.  Expression of a xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction , 1991, Cell.

[21]  P. Lemaire,et al.  A role for cytoplasmic determinants in mesoderm patterning: cell-autonomous activation of the goosecoid and Xwnt-8 genes along the dorsoventral axis of early Xenopus embryos. , 1994, Development.

[22]  Y. Sasai,et al.  Xenopus chordin: A novel dorsalizing factor activated by organizer-specific homeobox genes , 1994, Cell.

[23]  J. Gurdon,et al.  The community effect in Xenopus myogenesis is promoted by dorsalizing factors. , 1997, The International journal of developmental biology.

[24]  J M Slack,et al.  Single cell analysis of mesoderm formation in the Xenopus embryo. , 1991, Development.

[25]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Expression cloning of a Xenopus T-related gene (Xombi) involved in mesodermal patterning and blastopore lip formation. , 1996, Development.

[26]  J. Vaughan,et al.  Activins are expressed early in Xenopus embryogenesis and can induce axial mesoderm and anterior structures , 1990, Cell.

[27]  J. Gurdon.  Chapter 7 Methods for Nuclear Transplantation in Amphibia , 1977 .

[28]  T. Bouwmeester,et al.  Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann's organizer , 1996, Nature.

[29]  D. DeSimone,et al.  Integrin-dependent adhesive activity is spatially controlled by inductive signals at gastrulation. , 1996, Development.

[30]  D. Ejima,et al.  Presence of activin (erythroid differentiation factor) in unfertilized eggs and blastulae of Xenopus laevis. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Smith,et al.  Slow emergence of a multithreshold response to activin requires cell-contact-dependent sharpening but not prepattern. , 1994, Development.

[32]  J. Smith,et al.  Mesoderm induction and the control of gastrulation in Xenopus laevis: the roles of fibronectin and integrins. , 1990, Development.

[33]  F. Rosa.  Mix.1, a homeobox mRNA inducible by mesoderm inducers, is expressed mostly in the presumptive endodermal cells of Xenopus embryos , 1989, Cell.

[34]  J. Gurdon,et al.  The Xenopus T-box gene, Antipodean, encodes a vegetally localised maternal mRNA and can trigger mesoderm formation. , 1996, Development.

[35]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Markers of vertebrate mesoderm induction. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[36]  R. Harland,et al.  In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[37]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Nonradioactive in situ hybridization to xenopus tissue sections. , 2001, Methods.

[38]  P. Good,et al.  The LIM domain-containing homeo box gene Xlim-1 is expressed specifically in the organizer region of Xenopus gastrula embryos. , 1992, Genes & development.

[39]  T. Watabe,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of Spemann's organizer formation: conserved growth factor synergy between Xenopus and mouse. , 1995, Genes & development.

[40]  M. Mercola,et al.  Morphological differences in Xenopus embryonic mesodermal cells are specified as an early response to distinct threshold concentrations of activin. , 1994, Development.

[41]  P. Krieg,et al.  The XHex homeobox gene is expressed during development of the vascular endothelium: overexpression leads to an increase in vascular endothelial cell number , 1997, Mechanisms of Development.

[42]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Cells’ Perception of Position in a Concentration Gradient , 1998, Cell.

[43]  J. Smith,et al.  Responses of embryonic xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm , 1992, Cell.