Biopipe: a flexible framework for protocol-based bioinformatics analysis.

We identify several challenges facing bioinformatics analysis today. Firstly, to fulfill the promise of comparative studies, bioinformatics analysis will need to accommodate different sources of data residing in a federation of databases that, in turn, come in different formats and modes of accessibility. Secondly, the tsunami of data to be handled will require robust systems that enable bioinformatics analysis to be carried out in a parallel fashion. Thirdly, the ever-evolving state of bioinformatics presents new algorithms and paradigms in conducting analysis. This means that any bioinformatics framework must be flexible and generic enough to accommodate such changes. In addition, we identify the need for introducing an explicit protocol-based approach to bioinformatics analysis that will lend rigorousness to the analysis. This makes it easier for experimentation and replication of results by external parties. Biopipe is designed in an effort to meet these goals. It aims to allow researchers to focus on protocol design. At the same time, it is designed to work over a compute farm and thus provides high-throughput performance. A common exchange format that encapsulates the entire protocol in terms of the analysis modules, parameters, and data versions has been developed to provide a powerful way in which to distribute and reproduce results. This will enable researchers to discuss and interpret the data better as the once implicit assumptions are now explicitly defined within the Biopipe framework.

[1]  D. Higgins,et al.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Randy J. Zauhar,et al.  University bioinformatics programs on the rise , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Matthew R. Pocock,et al.  The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. , 2002, Genome research.

[4]  Nathan Goodman,et al.  The LabFlow System for Workflow Management in Large Scale Biology Research Laboratories , 1998, ISMB.

[5]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Peter Buneman,et al.  Challenges in Integrating Biological Data Sources , 1995, J. Comput. Biol..

[7]  Marina Chicurel,et al.  Bioinformatics: Bringing it all together technology feature , 2002, Nature.

[8]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  D. Roos,et al.  Bioinformatics--Trying to Swim in a Sea of Data , 2001, Science.

[10]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  A classification of tasks in bioinformatics , 2001, Bioinform..

[11]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  S. Karlin,et al.  Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  L. Stein Creating a bioinformatics nation , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Catherine Letondal,et al.  A Web interface generator for molecular biology programs in Unix , 2001, Bioinform..

[15]  S. Lewis,et al.  An integrated computational pipeline and database to support whole-genome sequence annotation , 2002, Genome Biology.

[16]  Philip Lijnzaad,et al.  The Ensembl genome database project , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..