Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is secreted exclusively by prostatic epithelial cells, and its serum concentration is increased in men with prostatic disease, including cancer. We evaluated its usefulness in the detection and staging of prostate cancer. METHODS We measured serum PSA concentrations in 1653 healthy men 50 or more years old. Those with PSA values greater than or equal to 4.0 micrograms per liter then underwent rectal examination and prostatic ultrasonography. Ultrasound-directed prostatic needle biopsies were performed in the men with abnormal findings on rectal examination, ultrasonography, or both. The results were compared with those in 300 consecutively studied men 50 or more years old who underwent ultrasound-directed biopsy because of symptoms or abnormal findings on rectal examination. RESULTS Serum PSA levels ranged from 4.0 to 9.9 micrograms per liter in 6.5 percent of the 1653 men (107). Nineteen of the 85 men in this group (22 percent) who had prostatic biopsies had prostate cancer. Serum PSA levels were 10.0 micrograms per liter or higher in 1.8 percent of the 1653 men (30). Eighteen of the 27 men in this group (67 percent) who had prostatic biopsies had cancer. If rectal examination alone had been used to screen the men who had biopsies, 12 of the 37 cancers (32 percent) would have been missed. If ultrasonography alone had been used to screen these men, 16 of the 37 cancers (43 percent) would have been missed. Serum PSA measurement had the lowest error rate of the tests, and PSA measurement plus rectal examination had the lowest error rate of the two-test combinations. CONCLUSIONS The combination of measurement of the serum PSA concentration and rectal examination, with ultrasonography performed in patients with abnormal findings, provides a better method of detecting prostate cancer than rectal examination alone.

[1]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen in the staging of localized prostate cancer: influence of tumor differentiation, tumor volume and benign hyperplasia. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[2]  W. Catalona,et al.  Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[3]  W. Catalona,et al.  Clinical use of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[4]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[5]  R. Vessella,et al.  The value of serum prostate specific antigen determinations before and after radical prostatectomy. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[6]  S. Feig,et al.  Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of localized prostatic cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[8]  T. Stamey,et al.  Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate , 1987 .

[9]  W F Taylor,et al.  Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program. , 1986, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[10]  N. Yang,et al.  Relative reliability of five serially measured markers for prognosis of progression in prostate cancer. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  F. Lee,et al.  Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology, and staging , 1986, The Prostate.

[12]  G. Murphy,et al.  Prostatic‐specific antigen: An immunohistologic marker for prostatic neoplasms , 1981, Cancer.