New classification of liver biopsy assessment for fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients before and after treatment

Liver fibrosis is the net result of dynamic changes between fibrogenesis and fibrolysis. Evidence has shown that antiviral therapy can reverse liver fibrosis or even early cirrhosis caused by hepatitis B virus. However, current evaluation systems mainly focus on the severity of, but not the dynamic changes in, fibrosis. Here, we propose a new classification to evaluate the dynamic changes in the quality of fibrosis, namely: predominantly progressive (thick/broad/loose/pale septa with inflammation); predominately regressive (delicate/thin/dense/splitting septa); and indeterminate, which displayed an overall balance between progressive and regressive scarring. Then, we used this classification to evaluate 71 paired liver biopsies of chronic hepatitis B patients before and after entecavir‐based therapy for 78 weeks. Progressive, indeterminate, and regressive were observed in 58%, 29%, and 13% of patients before treatment versus in 11%, 11%, and 78% after treatment. Of the 55 patients who showed predominantly regressive changes on posttreatment liver biopsy, 29 cases (53%) had fibrosis improvement of at least one Ishak stage, and, more interestingly, 25 cases (45%) had significant improvement in terms of Laennec substage, collagen percentage area, and liver stiffness despite remaining in the same Ishak stage. Conclusion: This new classification highlights the importance of assessing and identifying the dynamic changes in the quality of fibrosis, especially relevant in the era of antiviral therapy.(Hepatology 2017;65:1438‐1450)

[1]  E. Schiff,et al.  Long‐term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B , 2010, Hepatology.

[2]  Neil Kaplowitz,et al.  Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis , 1981, Hepatology.

[3]  Richard D Moore,et al.  Fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfected adults: Prospective analysis of 435 liver biopsy pairs , 2014, Hepatology.

[4]  Y. N. Park,et al.  The Laennec staging system for histological sub-classification of cirrhosis is useful for stratification of prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. , 2012, Journal of hepatology.

[5]  F. Shanahan,et al.  Tissue viral load variability in chronic hepatitis C , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  Laurent Castera,et al.  Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography. , 2008, Journal of hepatology.

[7]  George Kitis,et al.  Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B for up to 5 years. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[8]  J. Ludwig,et al.  The nomenclature of chronic active hepatitis: an obituary. , 1993, Gastroenterology.

[9]  P. Scheuer,et al.  Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment. , 1991, Journal of hepatology.

[10]  N. Terrault,et al.  AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B , 2016, Hepatology.

[11]  E. Schiff,et al.  Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  A. West,et al.  Regeneration of hepatocyte 'buds' in cirrhosis from intrabiliary stem cells. , 2003, Journal of hepatology.

[13]  J. de Groote Classification of Chronic Hepatitis. , 1976, Annals of clinical research.

[14]  P. Scheuer,et al.  Scheuer's Liver Biopsy Interpretation , 2015 .

[15]  S. Chang,et al.  Histological subclassification of cirrhosis using the Laennec fibrosis scoring system correlates with clinical stage and grade of portal hypertension. , 2011, Journal of hepatology.

[16]  M. Rugge,et al.  Liver biopsy sampling in chronic viral hepatitis. , 2004, Seminars in liver disease.

[17]  Hanry Yu,et al.  Fibro-C-Index: comprehensive, morphology-based quantification of liver fibrosis using second harmonic generation and two-photon microscopy. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  John F. Flaherty,et al.  Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study , 2013, The Lancet.

[19]  R. Standish,et al.  Computer‐assisted image analysis of liver collagen: Relationship to Ishak scoring and hepatic venous pressure gradient , 2009, Hepatology.

[20]  P. Bedossa Reversibility of hepatitis B virus cirrhosis after therapy: who and why? , 2015, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[21]  R. Torella,et al.  Diagnosis of chronic liver disease: reproducibility and validation of liver biopsy , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[22]  A. Stueck,et al.  Hepatocyte buds derived from progenitor cells repopulate regions of parenchymal extinction in human cirrhosis , 2015, Hepatology.

[23]  M. Sherman,et al.  Regression of human cirrhosis. Morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[24]  Hanry Yu,et al.  qFibrosis: a fully-quantitative innovative method incorporating histological features to facilitate accurate fibrosis scoring in animal model and chronic hepatitis B patients. , 2014, Journal of hepatology.

[25]  A. Chedid Regression of human cirrhosis. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  K. Ishak,et al.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. , 1995 .

[27]  N. Theise,et al.  Liver biopsies in chronic viral hepatitis: beyond grading and staging. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  M. Chevallier,et al.  A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: Comparison with morphometric studies , 1994, Hepatology.

[29]  H. Popper,et al.  The vocabulary of chronic hepatitis. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.