Inconsistency Adjustment in the AHP Using the Complete Transitivity Convergence Algorithm

In the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the pairwise comparisons are generally applied to determine the weights of multiple criteria at the same level or the ranks of alternatives under a specific criterion. However, when one must rate the importance of multiple criteria and each criterion uses different measurement units, or when one must determine the ranks of alternatives under a qualitative criterion, there is always an inconsistency problem. This research, based on complete transitivity of preference, develops a single stage recursive algorithm to find out outliers, and enables the pairwise comparison matrix to approximate complete transitivity. Identifying and adjusting of outliers are proven to be identical with the robust priority estimation method. Inconsistency adjustment using the complete transitivity convergence algorithm in a single stage can be applied in the multi-criteria decision problems with high calculation economy.

[1]  F. J. Dodd,et al.  Inverse inconsistency in analytic hierarchies , 1995 .

[2]  E. Blankmeyer.  Approaches to consistency adjustment , 1987 .

[3]  R. E. Jensen.  An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures , 1984 .

[4]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Linear methods in multimode data analysis for decision making , 1994, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[6]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios , 1984 .

[7]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[9]  B. Golany,et al.  A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices , 1993 .

[10]  Noel Bryson,et al.  A Goal Programming Method for Generating Priority Vectors , 1995 .

[11]  R. Kalaba,et al.  A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets , 1979 .

[12]  J. Barzilai.  Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 1997 .

[13]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Inconsistency and rank preservation , 1984 .

[15]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Dan Paulson,et al.  Consequences of uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process: A simulation approach , 1995 .