Analyzing fluctuations in car-following

Many car-following models predict a stable car-following behavior with a very small fluctuation around an equilibrium value g∗ of the net headway g with zero speed-difference Δv between the following and the lead vehicle. However, it is well-known and additionally demonstrated by data in this paper, that the fluctuations are much larger than these models predict. Typically, the fluctuation in speed difference is around ±2 m/s, while the fluctuation in the net time headway T = g/v can be as big as one or even two seconds, which is as large as the mean time headway itself. By analyzing data from loop detectors as well as data from vehicle trajectories, evidence is provided that this randomness is not due to driver heterogeneity, but can be attributed to an internal stochasticity of the driver itself. A final model-based analysis supports the hypothesis, that the preferred headway of the driver is the parameter that is not kept constant but fluctuates strongly, thus causing the even macroscopically observable randomness in traffic flow.

[1]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[2]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  New Estimation Technique for Vehicle-Type-Specific Headway Distributions , 1998 .

[3]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Wiedemann Revisited , 2011 .

[4]  Peter Wagner.  Empirical Description of Car-Following , 2005 .

[5]  Alexiadis,et al.  The next generation simulation program , 2004 .

[6]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[7]  S R Zein,et al.  SINGLE-POINT INTERCHANGES: A SAFETY AUDITOR'S PERSPECTIVE , 2004 .

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Determination of Interaction Potentials in Freeway Traffic From Steady-State Statistics , 2003, cond-mat/0301484.

[9]  P Fancher,et al.  Intelligent Cruise Control Field Operational Test , 1997 .

[10]  P. Wagner,et al.  Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow , 1997 .

[11]  Ludger Santen,et al.  Single-vehicle data of highway traffic: microscopic description of traffic phases. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  M. Krbálek,et al.  Headways in traffic flow: remarks from a physical perspective. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Interdriver Differences in Car-Following: A Vehicle Trajectory–Based Study , 2006 .

[14]  Peter Wagner,et al.  A time-discrete harmonic oscillator model of human car-following , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Wagner.  Modelling traffic flow fluctuations , 2008 .

[16]  Gunnar Flötteröd,et al.  Identifiability and Practical Relevance of Complex Car-Following Models , 2013 .

[17]  Adolf D. May,et al.  Traffic Flow Fundamentals , 1989 .

[18]  Richard Cowan,et al.  Useful headway models , 1975 .

[19]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model , 2002 .

[20]  Peter Wagner.  How human drivers control their vehicle , 2006 .

[21]  Antoine Tordeux,et al.  Adaptive Time Gap Car-Following Model , 2010 .

[22]  B. Kerner.  THE PHYSICS OF TRAFFIC , 1999 .

[23]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Calibration of Car-Following Models Using Floating Car Data , 2009 .