Accelerated approval of oncology products: a decade of experience.

We review the regulatory history of the accelerated approval process and summarize the U.S. Food and Drug Administration experience with accelerated approvals in oncology. The accelerated approval regulations, promulgated in 1992, allow approval of drugs for serious or life-threatening diseases on the basis of a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, such as survival or symptom benefit, pending completion of studies designed to confirm clinical benefit, referred to as phase 4 commitments, which are required to be conducted with due diligence. From 1992 to 2004, 22 applications involving anticancer drugs or biologics were approved. Of these 22 applications, accelerated approval was granted to 15 on the basis of findings from studies without an active comparator (i.e., single-arm studies or studies comparing two dose levels) and to the remaining seven on the basis of one or more randomized studies. Of the 22 approved applications, six (i.e., applications for dexrazoxane, irinotecan, capecitabine, docetaxel, imatinib mesylate, and oxaliplatin) have had one or more indications converted to regular approval. This review reports information that was presented at an Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting held in March 2003; it also presents a discussion of accelerated approval study designs, the study populations evaluated in the accelerated approval and confirmatory settings, and the integration of accelerated approval into a comprehensive drug development plan.

[1]  R. Pazdur,et al.  Approval summary: imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic and/or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  T. Powles,et al.  A randomised trial of six versus twelve courses of chemotherapy in metastatic carcinoma of the breast. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[4]  C. Spurr,et al.  Interrupted versus continuous chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Piedmont Oncology Association. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  S. Krown,et al.  Kaposi's sarcoma in the acquired immune deficiency syndrome: a proposal for uniform evaluation, response, and staging criteria. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Oncology Committee. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Labianca,et al.  Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  Velcade: U.S. FDA approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma progressing on prior therapy. , 2003, The oncologist.

[8]  R. Wittes,et al.  Commentary concerning demonstration of safety and efficacy of investigational anticancer agents in clinical trials. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Tattersall,et al.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Pazdur,et al.  FDA drug approval summary: gefitinib (ZD1839) (Iressa) tablets. , 2003, The oncologist.

[11]  Christian Jacques,et al.  Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[12]  D. Giannarelli,et al.  Randomized prospective clinical trial of high-dose epirubicin and dexrazoxane in patients with advanced breast cancer and soft tissue sarcomas. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  G. Sledge,et al.  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Alison Martin,et al.  U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summaries: imatinib mesylate, mesna tablets, and zoledronic acid. , 2002, The oncologist.

[15]  R. Pazdur,et al.  Approval summary for imatinib mesylate capsules in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[16]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Mark Rothmann,et al.  Approval summary: imatinib mesylate capsules for treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[19]  D Guthrie,et al.  Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  R. Pazdur,et al.  Gleevec for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia: US. Food and Drug Administration regulatory mechanisms, accelerated approval, and orphan drug status. , 2002, The oncologist.

[21]  X. H. Chen,et al.  Approval summary: gemtuzumab ozogamicin in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  S. Jagannath,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[23]  J. Carmichael,et al.  Comparison of short-term and continuous chemotherapy (mitozantrone) for advanced breast cancer , 1990, The Lancet.

[24]  Roy S Herbst,et al.  Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 2. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  R. Pazdur,et al.  United States Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval Summary , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  S. Salmon,et al.  Alternating combination chemotherapy and levamisole improves survival in multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. , 1983, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  G. Tucker,et al.  Clinical Measurement in Drug Evaluation , 1991 .

[28]  S. Hirschfeld,et al.  FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin. , 2004, The oncologist.

[29]  M. Stockler,et al.  Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer--when is enough enough? , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[30]  J. Berlin,et al.  Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.