Accuracy of data transfer: double data entry and estimating levels of error.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Most nursing research using quantitative empirical data involves entering information collected on data collection forms into a computer. This paper brings to attention issues related to the introduction of errors during this transfer of data and makes some recommendations as to how this might be dealt with. BACKGROUND Beyond concerns with the reliability and validity of data collection instruments, the issue of data accuracy and the introduction of errors in research data sets receive little mention in the nursing research literature. Given that studies have reported up to a 26.9 per cent error rate in data transfer (Goldberg et al. Proceedings American Medical Informatics Association, Annual Symposium November 2008), it is important that this potential problem is addressed in the context of nursing research. DESIGN Discursive paper. CONCLUSIONS An approach to checking the accuracy of data entered onto a computer via the keyboard is suggested, and a method for estimating the level of confidence that could be claimed regarding the number of errors introduced is outlined. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE If nursing is to be investigated by quantitative methods, it would seem that the accuracy of study findings is paramount. This paper identifies one area of research where errors are prone to arise and suggests a method for containing these.

[1]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Enhancing the validity and utility of randomized clinical trials in addictions treatment research: III. Data processing and statistical analysis. , 2007, Addiction.

[2]  B. Roberts,et al.  Data management: cleaning and checking. , 1997, Nursing research.

[3]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Ability-performance relationships as a function of age and task experience for a data entry task , 1998 .

[4]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data , 1962 .

[5]  John Alcock,et al.  Computer-assisted software transcription of qualitative interviews. , 2007, Nurse researcher.

[6]  Yasuo Ohashi,et al.  A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[7]  V. Seagroatt An introduction to medical statistics (2nd ed.) , 1996 .

[8]  D. Aeppli,et al.  Influences on inferences. Effect of errors in data on statistical evaluation , 1993 .

[9]  James A. Kole,et al.  Effects of prolonged work on data entry speed and accuracy. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  Ernest Perez,et al.  Savings from data entry engineering , 1998 .

[11]  B. Kirkwood Essentials of medical statistics. , 1988 .

[12]  Alexander Turchin,et al.  Analysis of Data Errors in Clinical Research Databases , 2008, AMIA.

[13]  J Cummings,et al.  Customized dual data entry for computerized data analysis. , 1994, Quality assurance.

[14]  Mary E Hardwick,et al.  The Use of Handheld Technology in Nursing Research and Practice , 2007, Orthopedic nursing.

[15]  S Day,et al.  Double data entry: what value, what price? , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  Larry A. Pace,et al.  Preventing human error: The impact of data entry methods on data accuracy and statistical results , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  L. Moody,et al.  Maintaining Data Integrity in Randomized Clinical Trials , 2002, Nursing research.