Performance‐based earthquake engineering assessment of a self‐centering, post‐tensioned concrete bridge system

Highway bridges in highly seismic regions can sustain considerable residual displacements in their columns following large earthquakes. These residual displacements are an important measure of post-earthquake functionality, and often determine whether or not a bridge remains usable following an earthquake. In this study, a self-centering system is considered that makes use of unbonded, post-tensioned steel tendons to provide a restoring force to bridge columns to mitigate the problem of residual displacements. To evaluate the proposed system, a code-conforming, case-study bridge structure is analyzed both with conventional reinforced concrete columns and with self-centering, post-tensioned columns using a formalized performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework. The PBEE analysis allows for a quantitative comparison of the relative performance of the two systems in terms of engineering parameters such as peak drift ratio as well as more readily understood metrics such as expected repair costs and downtime. The self-centering column system is found to undergo similar peak displacements to the conventional system, but sustains lower residual displacements under large earthquakes, resulting in similar expected repair costs but significantly lower expected downtimes.

[1]  P. Bazzurro,et al.  DYNAMIC VERSUS STATIC COMPUTATION OF THE RESIDUAL CAPACITY OF A MAINSHOCK-DAMAGED BUILDING TO WITHSTAND AN AFTERSHOCK , 2002 .

[2]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Residual Displacement Response Spectrum , 1998 .

[3]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  EARTHQUAKE SIMULATOR TESTS ON THE MITIGATION OF RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENTS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE COLUMNS , 2006 .

[4]  Norio Inoue,et al.  Shaking Table Tests of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1998 .

[5]  Keith Porter,et al.  An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .

[6]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[7]  R. Park,et al.  Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates , 1982 .

[8]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements , 2006 .

[9]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Use of Partially Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Columns to Reduce Post-Earthquake Residual Displacements of Bridges , 2006 .

[10]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges , 2003 .

[11]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[12]  John B. Mander,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGE PIERS , 1984 .

[13]  T. Shantz,et al.  Influence of Design Ground Motion Level on Highway Bridge Costs , 2004 .

[14]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Modeling Residual Displacements of Concrete Bridge Columns under Earthquake Loads Using Fiber Elements , 2010 .

[15]  C. Cornell,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGED BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[16]  B. Stojadinović,et al.  RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENT AND POST EARTHQUAKE CAPACITY OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 2002 .

[17]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering , 2004 .

[18]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Post‐earthquake bridge repair cost and repair time estimation methodology , 2009 .