Method of Pedestrian-vehicle Conflict Eliminating at Unsignalized Mid-block Crosswalks for Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous driving has become a popular topic in both industry and academia. For autonomous vehicles, driving safety is the primary prerequisite. Pedestrians are important traffic participants in urban roads. In the process of pedestrian-vehicle interaction, for pedestrians and autonomous vehicles in different locations at crosswalks, different conflicts eliminating measures may need to be adopted by autonomous vehicles, to ensure safety and efficiency of pedestrians and vehicles. According to different locations of vehicles and pedestrians, a conflict eliminating model of autonomous vehicle is proposed. Moreover, a cellular automaton model is developed to simulate the interaction between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. For vehicles and pedestrians in different locations, the model eliminates possible conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles according to rules. The results showed that the proposed conflict eliminating method can effectively avoid the conflict between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. Pedestrian safety and efficiency are improved significantly. Moreover, the efficiency of vehicle is also improved.

[1]  Dieter Spath,et al.  Driver Intention Algorithm for Pedestrian Protection and Automated Emergency Braking Systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Victor J. Blue,et al.  Cellular Automata Microsimulation of Bidirectional Pedestrian Flows , 1999 .

[3]  Jian-Qiao Sun,et al.  Studies of vehicle lane-changing to avoid pedestrians with cellular automata , 2015 .

[4]  R Kulmala,et al.  An application of logit models in analysing the behaviour of pedestrians and car drivers on pedestrian crossings. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  G. R. Patil,et al.  Pedestrian temporal and spatial gap acceptance at mid-block street crossing in developing world. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[6]  M. Baltes,et al.  Why People Cross Where They Do: The Role of Street Environment , 2002 .

[7]  Tamitza Toroyan,et al.  Global status report on road safety , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[8]  Xiaomeng Li,et al.  Using Cellular Automata to Investigate Pedestrian Conflicts with Vehicles in Crosswalk at Signalized Intersection , 2012, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.

[9]  George Yannis,et al.  Measuring accident risk exposure for pedestrians in different micro-environments. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Zhixiang Fang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk , 2016 .

[11]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic , 1992 .

[12]  George Yannis,et al.  A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models , 2009 .

[13]  Gang Ren,et al.  A cellular automaton simulation model for pedestrian and vehicle interaction behaviors at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Li-Ta Hsu,et al.  Human-like motion planning model for driving in signalized intersections , 2017 .

[15]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Modeling of Motorist-Pedestrian Interaction at Uncontrolled Mid-block Crosswalks , 2003 .

[16]  Ziyou Gao,et al.  Cellular Automaton Modeling of the Interaction between Vehicles and Pedestrians at Signalized Crosswalk , 2012 .

[17]  Irene Gohl,et al.  Analyzing driver-pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[18]  George Yannis,et al.  Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing , 2013 .